Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org)
Message-ID: <003601c75e02$7e952e80$7f01a8c0@VY1JA>
From: "J. Allen" <vy1ja@northwestel.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <002101c75b37$1e370680$6401a8c0@JAYTERMINAL> <001701c75b40$54bc2740$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL> <07d101c75de9$8355a620$7900a8c0@athlon1200>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 02:12:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: 500 Separate email by freqeuency
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hello All, especially 500 kHz. ers.

"Well done" to all who have been pioneering 500 kHz..
There has been a lot of traffic on the reflector for 500,
and that is to be expected because it is the new thing happening.

Most mail programs have the ability to sort mail into folders
by data contained in the "subject:" line.  For instance,
a subject line which was entered as:

SUBJECT:     "500 Excellent prop today into EU"

after passing through the reflector the subject would appear as:

"LF: 500 Excellent prop today into EU"

Anyone that then wished could have email rules set to search for
": 500" , ": 136", etc., and incoming LF mail would be divided
accordingly.  We would not need separate reflectors, and all mail could 
be sorted on the receiving end, with just a bit of help from the sender
and a gentleman's agreement on how to start our messages.

Thanks for reading.

J.