Return-Path: Received: (qmail 497 invoked from network); 22 Oct 1999 00:51:32 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 22 Oct 1999 00:51:32 +0100 Received: (qmail 30490 invoked from network); 21 Oct 1999 23:52:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 21 Oct 1999 23:52:25 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11eRmU-0003ys-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 00:38:02 +0100 Received: from rhenium.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.93]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11eRmT-0003yg-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 00:38:01 +0100 Received: from [62.6.23.162] (helo=default) by rhenium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 11eRmC-0001o3-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 00:37:45 +0100 Message-ID: <003601bf1c1c$8b8b7de0$39f0abc3@default> From: "Alan Melia" To: "rsgb_lf_group" Subject: LF: re Datong converter Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 00:30:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi Roger. That sounds like a nasty problem. I will try and throw some silly ideas up in the air, and let you shoot them down. 1. What kind of power supply do you have on the 735/740. Are these internal mains supplies and are the linear or switchers? Do you supply the Datong from these or an external battery. Low level switcher signals can sometimes be 'parametrically amplified' by transistors working in a totally different frequenct range. Have you tried feeding the converter from a battery, as even bench stabilised supplies do funny things particularly at low loading. I'm thinking of something modulating the crystal oscillator just a tiny bit. 35kHz is a fairly common typew of frequency for older switchers....but they are not stable and will drift around (probably killed that one myself) 2. Dave Tong still had an advert in the Jan 1999 Radcom, but a quick search does not suggest he has a web page, so maybe he can be reached at that phone/fax number still....I'm sure he would be interested. (0113 274 4822) 3. Is it 'rock' stable or does it move. If its rock stable it probably won't be a spurious oscillation somewhere. If it happens on 2 samples its a design effect I guess. I have known crystal oscillators 'hop' between a couple of close in spurious resonances at an audio rate. This is most likely to happen if the crystal is being strongly driven. Are there possibly decoupling components that cause a little 'modulation' on the oscillator as it is driven into limiting. If this effect is present it may be noticable on an spectrum analyser, at the crystal frequency. (as another thought, it occurs to me that the rock is probably a 28Mhz 3rd overtone.....if the fundamental mode was not fully supressed the 3rd harmonic of that would appear about 30 to 40kHz higher , and it would be quite stable) 4. It might be possible if it is an LF signal generated in the converter to see the signal at the fundamental on the output of the Datong even on a sensitive scope or a LW BC receiver. 5. I suppose it could be an intermod product of some kind...I dont think that sounds likely. On the whole I think I favour 3. ..... but that is probably only because it sounds a bit wierd. The ideas are probably no use at all, but they may start you looking in an area you perhaps hadn't considered. In brainstorms I find 'silly ideas' break 'tramline' thinking patterns. Hope you find it, strange signals are a pain when you are digging for weak stuff. 73 de Alan G3NYK Alan.Melia@btinternet.com