Return-Path: Received: (qmail 72988 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2005 08:34:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore03.plus.net) (192.168.71.7) by ptb-mailstore03.plus.net with SMTP; 3 Apr 2005 08:34:44 -0000 Received: from Debian-exim by ptb-spamcore03.plus.net with spam-scanned (Exim 4.44) id 1DI0ZA-000674-7F for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:34:44 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1DI0ZA-000671-5X for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:34:44 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1DI0cr-0003us-KD for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:38:33 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DI0YX-0001T0-Uq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:34:05 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DI0YX-0001Sr-Gi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:34:05 +0100 Received: from mta201-rme.xtra.co.nz ([210.86.15.144]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DI0YV-0005Xz-Bw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 09:34:05 +0100 Received: from mta2-rme.xtra.co.nz ([210.86.15.240]) by mta201-rme.xtra.co.nz with ESMTP id <20050403083355.YMMP23759.mta201-rme.xtra.co.nz@mta2-rme.xtra.co.nz> for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:33:55 +1200 Received: from quaycustomer ([222.153.168.166]) by mta2-rme.xtra.co.nz with SMTP id <20050403083354.SAGY8463.mta2-rme.xtra.co.nz@quaycustomer> for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:33:54 +1200 Message-ID: <003501c53829$4915b0a0$c401a8c0@quaycustomer> From: "Vernall" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <80.24dbe7d4.2f807e15@aol.com> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:43:58 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of xtra.co.nz designates 210.86.15.144 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,HTML_50_60=0.095,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Weak signals Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v4.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Thanks to Markus for results.
 
73, Bob ZL2CA
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Weak signals

Dear Bob, Teo and LF,

tonight's signals sorted by frequency were

18:00...19:52  923.19...922.98 qrss120 "S52AB"
18:02...18:24  922.06/21.96; 18:27...19:15  921.99/.89 dfcw100 DF6"NM" (0.3W EMRP)
17:02...19:21  921.73...921.71 qrss60 YU7"AR"
18:00...20:44  921.58/.51...921.39/.31 dfcw180 G3"AQC"
http://members.aol.com/df6nm2/testEu0504022100.gif (142kB)

Unfortunately the detective's vision on signal timing was somewhat impaired, due to the fragmentation by his own transmitted dashes. But time and frequency of your trace clearly indicate that you have caught Teo's fifth "AR", which he sent from 18:27 to 18:42.

The signal was visible on both Argo30s (21mHz, 12s) and Argo120s (5mHz, 3s) settings. BTW my own preferred setting usually is "90s slow", as it provides a reasonably long screenfill duration with less "pixel-stretching" at 10 milliHz resolution.  

73 and all the best

Markus, DF6NM


In einer eMail vom 02.04.2005 23:12:28 Westeuropäische Sommerzeit schreibt vernall@xtra.co.nz:

Hi all,

It looks like more weak signals in captures viewed this morning.  I've sent
30 and 120 second dot length Argo files to Detective Vester for analysis.

73, Bob ZL2CA