Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from rly-db01.mx.aol.com (rly-db01.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.76]) by air-db06.mail.aol.com (v120.9) with ESMTP id MAILINDB063-aa6474402073c6; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:01:47 -0400
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db01.mx.aol.com (v120.9) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB014-aa6474402073c6; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:01:45 -0400
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1IumOc-00049D-D9
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:01:26 +0000
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1IumOc-000494-03
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:01:26 +0000
Received: from smtpout0163.sc1.he.tucows.com ([64.97.136.163] helo=n064.sc1.he.tucows.com)
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>)
	id 1IumOX-00047I-T2
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:01:25 +0000
Received: from sc1-out05.emaildefenseservice.com (64.97.139.2) by n064.sc1.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1)
        id 47030C3D003ECF6A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:01:11 +0000
X-SpamScore: 2
X-Spamcatcher-Summary: 2,0,0,bfca19d0f1fa3745,cb65441a52534549,g3kev.ham@virgin.net,-,RULES_HIT:355:379:539:540:541:542:543:567:599:600:601:945:946:960:973:988:989:1155:1156:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1542:1587:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1766:1792:2073:2075:2078:2198:2199:2393:2551:2553:2559:2562:2689:2828:2892:3027:3318:3354:3636:3865:3866:3867:3868:3869:3870:3871:3873:3874:4250:4434:5007:7576,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,
	DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:none,DNSBL:none
X-Spamcatcher-Explanation: 
Received: from g3kev (unknown [64.97.206.40])
	by sc1-out05.emaildefenseservice.com (Postfix) with SMTP
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:01:10 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <003301c82c25$718801d0$16e4fc3e@g3kev>
From: "hamilton mal" <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <000c01c82b85$97ec0010$2ee4fc3e@g3kev><47430398.8000702@telia.com><000201c82bc1$3c442300$2be4fc3e@g3kev> <20071120225305.4f9303d9@lurcher.twatt.local>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:00:27 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Karma: 0: 
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none
Subject: Re: LF: CLASS E
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20
X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n
X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n


You must have missed my article in the early days about  my class E and all
the parameters, and especially monitoring the waveform V for correct
operation. Things have moved on to class F and G but info is sparse maybe
you have details.
Ever thought about your own COMIC for some short stories and DX experiences.
G3KEV


----- Original Message -----
From: "John Pumford-Green GM4SLV" <gm4slv@sighthound.demon.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: LF: CLASS E


>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:57:18 -0000
> "hamilton mal" <g3kev.ham@virgin.net> wrote:
>
> > There has been very little response from anyone else about class
> > E amp experiences, I expect they have never heard about this type of
> > amplifier, or do not use them.
>
>
> Er....have I missed something...?
>
> I seem to remember several people responded when you asked the
> same question on Nov 4th. There were plenty of answers to your query
> about efficiency etc. with a few measured values from real amplifiers
> and some discussion of the theory and practice of switching PAs.
>
> I understood from the level of response that several people (myself
> included) were using Class-E amps. Perhaps this time round they have
> decided not to repeat their answers.
>
> I think that most people, despite your snide implication, have in fact
> "heard about this type of amplifier" and possibly know enough about
> them not to need to go over the same ground every few weeks for your
> entertainment.
>
>
> Since you've furnished us with some scant information about your own
> Class-E experiments perhaps you'd like to enlighten us to the actual
> performance figures, the hard facts that that you've tried to solicit
> from others?
>
>
>
> DC supply volts/current?
>
> Output power?
>
> Efficiency?
>
> Harmonic and spurious emissions?
>
> Temeprature rise of the heatsink after 10 hours key down at full power?
>
>
> Enquiring minds would like to know....
>
> John
>
>
>
>