Return-Path: Received: from rly-db01.mx.aol.com (rly-db01.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.76]) by air-db06.mail.aol.com (v120.9) with ESMTP id MAILINDB063-aa6474402073c6; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:01:47 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db01.mx.aol.com (v120.9) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB014-aa6474402073c6; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:01:45 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1IumOc-00049D-D9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:01:26 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1IumOc-000494-03 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:01:26 +0000 Received: from smtpout0163.sc1.he.tucows.com ([64.97.136.163] helo=n064.sc1.he.tucows.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IumOX-00047I-T2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:01:25 +0000 Received: from sc1-out05.emaildefenseservice.com (64.97.139.2) by n064.sc1.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 47030C3D003ECF6A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:01:11 +0000 X-SpamScore: 2 X-Spamcatcher-Summary: 2,0,0,bfca19d0f1fa3745,cb65441a52534549,g3kev.ham@virgin.net,-,RULES_HIT:355:379:539:540:541:542:543:567:599:600:601:945:946:960:973:988:989:1155:1156:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1542:1587:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1766:1792:2073:2075:2078:2198:2199:2393:2551:2553:2559:2562:2689:2828:2892:3027:3318:3354:3636:3865:3866:3867:3868:3869:3870:3871:3873:3874:4250:4434:5007:7576,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none, DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:none,DNSBL:none X-Spamcatcher-Explanation: Received: from g3kev (unknown [64.97.206.40]) by sc1-out05.emaildefenseservice.com (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <003301c82c25$718801d0$16e4fc3e@g3kev> From: "hamilton mal" To: References: <000c01c82b85$97ec0010$2ee4fc3e@g3kev><47430398.8000702@telia.com><000201c82bc1$3c442300$2be4fc3e@g3kev> <20071120225305.4f9303d9@lurcher.twatt.local> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:00:27 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Karma: 0: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: CLASS E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : n You must have missed my article in the early days about my class E and all the parameters, and especially monitoring the waveform V for correct operation. Things have moved on to class F and G but info is sparse maybe you have details. Ever thought about your own COMIC for some short stories and DX experiences. G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Pumford-Green GM4SLV" To: Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 10:53 PM Subject: Re: LF: CLASS E > > On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:57:18 -0000 > "hamilton mal" wrote: > > > There has been very little response from anyone else about class > > E amp experiences, I expect they have never heard about this type of > > amplifier, or do not use them. > > > Er....have I missed something...? > > I seem to remember several people responded when you asked the > same question on Nov 4th. There were plenty of answers to your query > about efficiency etc. with a few measured values from real amplifiers > and some discussion of the theory and practice of switching PAs. > > I understood from the level of response that several people (myself > included) were using Class-E amps. Perhaps this time round they have > decided not to repeat their answers. > > I think that most people, despite your snide implication, have in fact > "heard about this type of amplifier" and possibly know enough about > them not to need to go over the same ground every few weeks for your > entertainment. > > > Since you've furnished us with some scant information about your own > Class-E experiments perhaps you'd like to enlighten us to the actual > performance figures, the hard facts that that you've tried to solicit > from others? > > > > DC supply volts/current? > > Output power? > > Efficiency? > > Harmonic and spurious emissions? > > Temeprature rise of the heatsink after 10 hours key down at full power? > > > Enquiring minds would like to know.... > > John > > > >