Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12567 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2000 09:22:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 23 Jun 2000 09:22:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 29826 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2000 08:03:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 23 Jun 2000 08:03:29 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 135OHt-0007pM-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:54:05 +0100 Received: from kerberos.telecom.cz ([194.228.2.35] helo=mail.core.telecom.cz) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 135OHs-0007pH-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:54:04 +0100 Received: from dell1.cz.gmc.net ([194.228.225.18]) by mail.core.telecom.cz (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA19520 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 09:54:01 +0200 Received: from p (p.maly.cz.gmc.net [192.168.1.35]) by dell1.cz.gmc.net with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id N39LKQQK; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 09:56:46 +0200 Message-ID: <003301bfdce8$94309b00$2301a8c0@maly.cz.gmc.net> From: "Petr Maly" To: "136 group" Subject: LF: Shrinking sounds - fiasco Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 09:56:46 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hello all Yesterday I spent a while with shrinking WAV's in SoundForge and CoolEdit. In the original file (da0lf), there is nothing heard by ear, but when the file is open in the Gram, the signal trace is clearly visible. I tried to shrink to 50% of the previous length as a first step. I could not hear anything either. When I opened the new file in the Gram, the signal disappeared completely. I guess the main reason is that unlike the Bill's method, this one doesn't lead to narrowing the bandwidth. Simply, it doesn't work. I must try Bill's software. 73, Petr, OK1FIG