Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dg11.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dg11.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.19]) by air-di04.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDI044-eac54c0d3bc9212; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:34:49 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dg11.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5D1DE380009D5; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 14:34:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OLh8o-0006dT-KG for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:33:42 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OLh8n-0006c7-Ve for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:33:41 +0100 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OLh8j-0004Hy-Oy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:33:41 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah8JAO/YDExcEYLt/2dsb2JhbACHY4orjBJxwFWFFwQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,379,1272841200"; d="scan'208";a="293848642" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.17.130.237]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 07 Jun 2010 19:33:29 +0100 Message-ID: <003201cb066f$eb54a280$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <657E7065AC4C454AB63F6C7C2FF043F6@Black> <003101cb04c2$0913cc10$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <1607287044.1492139.1275754813942.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb034> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C24@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <7.0.1.0.1.20100606111158.018277a8@magma.ca> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1C28@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <002001cb066b$9d0ddd70$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4C0D37C8.9030209@gmx.com> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:33:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41134c0d3bc750a8 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Mike In the UK most are opposed to big signals if what you read on here is true. If I lived in the USA it would be a different story, especially way out west, some amateur radio stations in California rival the commercials. W6AM and W6HX were better equipped than the local BC and Coastal stations. I have been to both. g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike.WE0H" To: Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 7:17 PM Subject: Re: VLF: RX stations in Canada and US? > Build it and others will follow. Go for that big CW signal. If you don't > try, maybe nobody else will. > > Mike > WE0H >