Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31324 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2003 19:38:25 -0000 Received: from netmail01.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.219) by mailstore with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 19:38:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 22843 invoked by uid 10001); 30 Apr 2003 19:38:25 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 19:38:25 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19AxOO-0007ki-1E for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 20:37:24 +0100 Received: from [194.73.73.93] (helo=rhenium.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19AxOI-0007kZ-76 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 20:37:18 +0100 Received: from dial81-135-37-151.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([81.135.37.151] helo=Main) by rhenium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #23) id 19AxOG-0001Zg-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 20:37:17 +0100 Message-ID: <003201c30f4f$ee182a60$6507a8c0@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000c01c30f29$700bc080$bbe4fc3e@l8p8y6> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 20:36:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: strange condx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.7 required=5.0tests=ORIGINAL_MESSAGE,REFERENCESversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Mal, thanks for the interesting report. I have looked at the darkness shadow at that time using Geoclock, and it crosses the path at quite an angle, approximately between Berlin and Helsinki. That means the ionosphere is probably still illuminated at around the Russian boarder. My guess is that the early signal was a one hop path from the bottom of the E-layer at about 100kms altitude. Later higher order paths become possible as your end of the path goes into darkness and these destructively interfere giving very deep sharp fades. It is surprising under present conditions that the initial signal was so strong as it is a "long hop". Two hop signals would normally be stronger and more stable over that distance except that there is a lot of nightime absorption due to the after-effects of the geomagnetic activity. This would weaken the two hop signals. Maybe that makes them of similar strength to the one hop and hence the deep fade (cancellation when the phases oppose) Of course I could just be totally wrong....but it sounds like a good story. Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "hamilton mal" To: Sent: 30 April 2003 16:01 Subject: LF: strange condx Yesterday early evening around 1900 z RN6BN was a very strong signal, stronger than usual about S6 then about one hour later he suddenly started to disappear, this is when I worked him on 137.7 QRS3, we have worked before. Although weaker he was solid O copy and he gave me the same report. Shortly after we worked he disappeared totally on a CQ then re appeared, perfectly readable but during the evening never got as strong as around 1900z. I have not noticed this rapid QSB on signals before on 136 khz There seemed to be some unusual propogation at this time. YU7AR and OK1DTN were very strong with some variations on their signals also during the evening. I also observed some DL acty and DK8KM on hellscriber or some variation of the mode, solid signal. 73 de Mal/G3KEV