Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=193.82.116.20;
From: "John W Gould" <jwgould@iee.org.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:16:42 +0100
Message-ID: <003101c7e031$99af2480$0b01a8c0@acer5gi5q0ubzj>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Importance: Normal
Subject: LF: Summary reports from typical urban station...
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

I've had an extremely detailed reply (direct) from John, GM4SLV, that =
will
greatly help me draft a decent paper for the Ofcom meeting.  However, as
John points out his experience is one that represents a station in a =
quiet
radio location.  To give a more balanced view it would be useful to have =
a
report from one or two stations who can provide some examples of =
estimated
(or measured) ERP levels, CW signal reports, RX and Aerial details from =
a
typical urban location where the noise level is likely to be much higher =
and
environmental factors possibly reduce the actual ERP in the far field.
Direct e-mails might be best, to save clogging up the reflector, as you =
can
then add some wav files, if you have them.

73 John, G3WKL
RSGB HF Manager

g3wkl@btinternet.com