Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31767 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2003 19:28:34 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 31 Mar 2003 19:28:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 21196 invoked by uid 10001); 31 Mar 2003 19:28:33 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 31 Mar 2003 19:28:33 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1904wQ-0007Bw-AR for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 20:27:34 +0100 Received: from [62.253.164.47] (helo=mta7-svc.business.ntl.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1904wG-0007Bi-3Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 20:27:24 +0100 Received: from l8p8y6 ([62.252.232.203]) by mta7-svc.business.ntl.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20030331192722.DOAE27609.mta7-svc.business.ntl.com@l8p8y6> for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 20:27:22 +0100 Message-ID: <003101c2f7b3$1954f500$cbe8fc3e@l8p8y6> From: "hamilton mal" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000501c2f7a3$1f8d9ea0$07d2fc3e@ian> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 19:15:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Frustration! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.9 required=5.0tests=ORIGINAL_MESSAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCESversion=2.51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.51 (1.174.2.5-2003-03-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Kyle" To: "Ed Lesnichy" ; Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 5:31 PM Subject: LF: Frustration! > Hi Ed, hi all, > > been workin the old socks off these last few days only to wind up where > I started. Put loading coil outside last Friday and got an immediate > worthwhile increase in antenna current. Ever suspicious, checked it with the > rough-cut plywood panels for its rightful home chocked perilously round it > and all well. > Finished box yesterday except for antenna access and waterproofing so got > stuck in today to finish job by lining with 'turkey foil' and sealing > antenna entry point. Result? > Worse than when indoors even after much rematching and tuning, so ripped off > foil and am now back where I was for antenna current, it's blowing like mad > and rain is on the way. But at least the dam'thing isn't taking up space in > the shack. Hello Ian NEVER put your loading coil in a metal box, it totally destroys the efficiency. Consider it as part of the antenna from the radiation point of view. You have never seen a loading coil on a Mobile encased in a metal CAN, the coil contributes to the over all efficiency ie coil plus whip. I have seen reference to encasing the loading coil here on this reflector that is why those signals are poor. My coil sits outside exposed to the elements and does not seem to be effected by changing wx, neither does the amps vary whether it be dry or wet. Recent info on here suggests heating the loading coil to increase the amps consumed, if this is the case the coil wire, insulation etc is very suspect. I change my antenna wire and rewind a new coil at least once a year. I also check the insulated radials and change if necessary. Try a turkey next Xmas without the FOIL, Foil is nether good for antenna coils or Turkeys 73 de Mal/G3KEV > Suspect earthing troubles but in the meantime I think I'll take to drink! > Little point in trying to set skeds with RU, but as some broad said in some > movie or other "tomorrow is another day" > > MI0AYZ > > PS - will be watching and listening Tuesday and available if anyone wants to > take a chance on a sked. > > > >