Return-Path: X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id sBN0Fs2S007666 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 01:15:54 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Y3D2Q-000263-6O for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:09:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Y3D2P-00025u-Qh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:09:21 +0000 Received: from conuserg009.nifty.com ([202.248.44.35] helo=conuserg009-v.nifty.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1Y3D2L-0001Cd-LP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 00:09:20 +0000 Received: from HidehoDell (g176104.scn-net.ne.jp [219.117.176.104]) (authenticated) by conuserg009-v.nifty.com with ESMTP id sBN08vr7024035 for ; Tue, 23 Dec 2014 09:08:57 +0900 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=nifty.com Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=mar2011msa; t=1419293337; bh=2x+kro3VUA0ysM8luokTWlY0oRysSdbG7odJdxzqha4=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=EVOWmIbqsIswjv9OcFCCIXQmQ/NPsr2d/UD6sbpG2F+4OW1QikciUO7CnSHkkLkAJ NWPL0K6+OMCmrT0+qzMjasyJXHrGZMuEHU7v3goen+r4id0kQPVLxZSrE8Ehkr/VyG LRNQVwdu4Jt525QlENgMFs7IVx7UX+l3SN4tR6QM= X-Nifty-SrcIP: [219.117.176.104] From: "Hideho YAMAMURA" To: References: <00b601d01d18$87884620$9698d260$@nifty.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 09:08:50 +0900 Message-ID: <003001d01e44$a16ae110$e440a330$@nifty.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQK/c0x7zLDhEKX/tG52Wjzd9moXYQEtYwZ4AhKV+Oeao538kA== Content-Language: ja X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 202.248.44.35 (conuserg009.nifty.com) used invalid HELO/EHLO conuserg009-v.nifty.com - verification failed X-Scan-Signature: 0b36c952c26be93e626fe2fa1c93657f Subject: RE: LF: RE: Japan on 475 kHz. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by paranoid.lipkowski.org id sBN0Fs2S007666 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1581 Dimitris, Nice that you don't hear complaints. > I have not heard of any complains about interference to the MW BC service That's nice. > I use a low pass filter which ensures that the harmonics are -50 dBc or > lower. I think the tuned antenna also helps with not radiating too much My quick calculation resulted in -120dBc necessary, to reduce QRM to adjacent houses, (I may be wrong)., and I am thinking how to make it. > .... in Australia. We are allowed > 5 W EIRP and operators do transmit at that level. We should try reception first. 73s Hideho YAMAMURA/JF1DMQ > because of operation on 630m here in Australia. We are allowed > 5 W EIRP and operators do transmit at that level. My guess is that the lack > of interference complains is partly because of the generally good practice > on behalf of the few amateurs that are making use of the band and partly > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Dimitrios > Tsifakis > Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 8:58 AM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: RE: Japan on 475 kHz. > > Hi Hideho san, > > Thank you for the update. I am glad to hear that even though you have all > these tough restrictions, Japanese amateurs are planning portable > operations in the new band! > > > > I would like to know the situations in the already operating stations. > > Do you have any BC QRM problem ? (I mean making interference, not > > receiving), and what care do you take ? > > I have not heard of any complains about interference to the MW BC service > because of operation on 630m here in Australia. We are allowed > 5 W EIRP and operators do transmit at that level. My guess is that the lack > of interference complains is partly because of the generally good practice > on behalf of the few amateurs that are making use of the band and partly > because of limited audience of the MW BC stations. > > > LPF, what kind, other means ? > > How much is your harmonic attenuation ? or filter attenuation ? > > Information highly appreciated, > > > I use a low pass filter which ensures that the harmonics are -50 dBc or > lower. I think the tuned antenna also helps with not radiating too much > harmonics power. > > 73, Dimitris VK1SV