X-GM-THRID: 1211805792599313907 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 355c4f426b39bc64fd932b4182f3ed96622ea263 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.249.16 with SMTP id w16cs258580qbh; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.29.2 with SMTP id g2mr1756113nfj; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id c10si2237693nfb.2006.08.15.11.54.20; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1GD3xb-0003p4-SJ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:48:19 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1GD3xb-0003ov-AD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:48:19 +0100 Received: from smtp809.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.69]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GD3xV-0000yG-Q4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:48:19 +0100 Received: (qmail 88428 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2006 18:47:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lark) (alan.melia@btinternet.com@81.131.2.15 with login) by smtp809.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Aug 2006 18:47:05 -0000 Message-ID: <003001c6c09b$349b61a0$0300a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <001c01c6c07d$4c8d2000$4cbe3b3e@fujitsu> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 19:46:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.551 Subject: LF: Re: PA4VHF tests finished for now Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4686 The SWR antenna current is an interesting effect there are several things this could be ,.It could be that at the highest current you are providing the right reactive load to move the PA towards Class E or even away from it. This mode does not give best efficiency at the highest output current and must be tuned to the "right" power level and not for max smoke. You need to look at the DC power at each condition.....you may find you are runing 50 % more DC power for a little more antenna current. Sorry I was out today so not listening to your tests. 73 Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: Dick To: Sent: 15 August 2006 16:12 Subject: LF: PA4VHF tests finished for now When tuning the variometer I could see how the SWR changed, however with lowest SWR I didn't have the highest antenna current. There is a little difference between these 2. When tuning for max antennacurrent, the swr is not at it's lowest level, but a bit up, but below 1:1,5 I couldn'r run more power, because protection circuit of TX came in. Had to reduce voltage to 42V in order to keep the TX running. I have to change the output transformer I'm afraid. It does work perfect into a 50Ohm dummyload, but when connected to the antenna, things are different. Also burnt my fingers on a little metalswitch.......oeffffffff..there was strong RF present on TX case. TX was close , within 3m of antenna.......can't advise that, hi. Later changed that to 6m, and no more RF-on case, hi. 73 Dick, PA4VHF