Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Mon, 16 May 2005 04:43:47 +0100 Received: from [192.168.71.1] (helo=ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DXWWB-00041d-5h for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 16 May 2005 04:43:47 +0100 Received: from Debian-exim by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spam-scanned (Exim 4.50) id 1DXWS4-0001Eo-49 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 16 May 2005 04:39:32 +0100 Received: from [192.168.101.73] (helo=pih-mxcore07.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DXWS4-0001El-2H for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 16 May 2005 04:39:32 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore07.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DXWS3-0001cJ-Qz for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 16 May 2005 04:39:31 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DXWQq-0001ag-Kv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 May 2005 04:38:16 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DXWQq-0001aX-9K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 May 2005 04:38:16 +0100 Received: from outbound01.telus.net ([199.185.220.220] helo=priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DXWQo-0007v3-KL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 May 2005 04:38:16 +0100 Received: from cognizant1 ([64.180.173.28]) by priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with SMTP id <20050516033800.JUVX1202.priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net@cognizant1>; Sun, 15 May 2005 21:38:00 -0600 Message-ID: <003001c559c8$d2ba8ea0$0201a8c0@private.network> From: "Scott Tilley" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, lowfer@lwca.org Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 20:39:11 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of telus.net designates 199.185.220.220 as permitted sender Subject: LF: CFH on 122.5KHz Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v4.00s) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Has anyone done serious monitoring of CFH on 122.5 and compared it to results of monitoring attempts on CFH at 137KHz?

Seems that the station on 122.5 is on the air constantly and would be curious if there is a strong correlation between prop on the two freq?

73 Scott

Check the status of radio beacon 'TIL' in CN89lg at:
www.scottboxx.com/radio