Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CC0BA380000A0; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 04:05:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbSHd-0000uG-4w for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 09:05:01 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbSHc-0000u1-8v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 09:05:00 +0100 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbSHa-0005Js-95 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 09:04:59 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AugJAI1rzE9cF/bI/2dsb2JhbABFiX2ofASBJoEIghMFAQEEAQgBAQMlASMCJgYBAQMFAgEDEQQBAQolFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBh2wDBgmsQguJUIsRToIsgxYDjT2QfoZWgmA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,711,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="540258907" Received: from host-92-23-246-200.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.246.200]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 04 Jun 2012 09:04:57 +0100 Message-ID: <002f01cd4228$bae27220$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <4FCB96A9.4010009@usa.net> <4FCB9F34.7040604@legal-medicine.de> <4FCBCC8B.9050308@usa.net> <77A08BCA-E9AB-404B-B425-BFD3564F66FE@thelortons.co.uk> <535C7AB088034F3CAF4C51D1FF382816@AGB> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 08:04:56 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Good idea Graham. I hope the blacksheep will continue. mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham" To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 7:40 AM Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.242 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.5 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 6ffbd2c9950b634d6cc91f9565b01a8b Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:488499296:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d61864fcc6c565453 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Good idea Graham. I hope the blacksheep will continue. mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham" To: Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 7:40 AM Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep > Yes 'Flash' traffic only on the ref > > G. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Clive Lorton" > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 8:04 AM > To: ; > Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep > > > Gentlemen, > > > > I’m beginning to think there has to be a place for both groups. Blacksheep > > as it generally is now for QSO and signal reports and Yahoo for technical > > discussion. That way daily QSO information will not be archived and > > design/construction projects can make full use of the search function and > > files section of Yahoo. > > > > Just my two pence worth…….. > > > > Clive g8poc > >