Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mp09.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mp09.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.193.77]) by air-ma10.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMA103-b5424d08f491c7; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:02:10 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp09.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 229E0380001DA; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:02:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1PSuig-0003pd-LC for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:00:50 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1PSuig-0003pU-60 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:00:50 +0000 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PSuie-0005vv-Ag for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:00:50 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAHABqDCE1Ok8JC/2dsb2JhbACDZIRBnAZzsjKREYEhgzV0BI4r X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,349,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="348036857" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.194.66]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 15 Dec 2010 17:00:40 +0000 Message-ID: <002f01cb9c79$9aa23a50$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <1292360809.3356.74.camel@gerhard-desktop> <003701cb9be9$46bb5b00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4D08D9C8.50607@o2.ie> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:00:40 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: Earth Antennnas - General question Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14d4d08f48d7980 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Tony Nice to see you join in on the discussion. This is an interesting experiment and my first thought would be that it is behaving like a Beverage antenna. Direction might indicate something for instance rotate it 90 degs and check the signal strength One experiment I thought might be interesting is to resonate a low long wire height say 20 ft and 200 ft long earthed by a spike at the far end and feed the near end with a signal. The signal source sent via coax, the centre pin to the wire and the earth shield to a ground pin. then put an atu between the coax shield and the near ground pin and resonate it if possible ie a tuned ground as well as a tuned/resonated wire. This antenna would really be a Grounded quad loop, the 200 ft wire plus 20 ft height x 2== 240 ft total and the earth/ground would be the other half ie total length 2 x 240 == 480 ft. The theory is that the ground would provide a mirror image of the wire above it. So for vertical quad loops, delta loops you only need build one half above ground and the ground provides the other hal There was an article years ago in QST magazine by Belrose that explained the theory for an 80m grounded delta loop. Natural resonance should be 2 Mcs Resonate the wire at a frequency of choice This is all interesting but I prefer to use a more convential antenna system that I know will work 73 es gl de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony" To: Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 3:07 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Earth Antennnas - General question > Hi Mal & LF > > Your comments prompted me to carry out some simple tests today. > I layed out a 25m length of Thompson RG 214/U double screened coax on > the lawn and connected the centre conductor at the far end to a > stainless steel rod abt 300mm long pressed into moist soil. > In the shack I measured the signal strength of DHO-38 at -51 dB with the > coax screen connected to the station earth. > I then disconnected the station earth and still measured -51 db and then > I strapped screen and conductor together and still measured -51dB > Then I added an extra 10m of coax and elevated it all to an average of > 2m above the ground and carried out all the above again with absolutely > no difference in signal strength. > Finally I pulled the earth rod out of the ground and the signal dropped > to -94 dB and then I disconnected the coax totally from the earth rod > and the signal dropped to -102 dB. > Make of that what you will. > > I also out of interest connected my MFJ antenna analyser and found that > the SWR was fairly flat across the whole spectrum (between 2:1 and 8:1) > from 1.8 MHz to 150 MHz, although I don't think I will hear much on 2m > > 73, Tony, EI8JK. > > . > On 14/12/2010 23:47, mal hamilton wrote: > > Gerhard > > Yes the antennas described by Stefan and Roger and others are of the LOSSY > > variety and similar to Beverages. > > I have made this observation before. I cannot see how these elevated > > antennas can be considered Earth Mode since they propagate a signal into the > > ether to be received at a distance by another elevated antenna several > > metres above ground. > > de mal/g3kev > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Gerhard Hickl" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 9:06 PM > > Subject: LF: Earth Antennnas - General question > > > > > >> Hi all ! > >> > >> I was following the whole discussion about the so called "earth-mode" > >> and the used antennas with interest. > >> > >> Mal told us that he sees those antennas as "lossy dipoles" while others > >> stated they are "true" earth-antennas. > >> > >> I don't have the theoretical background to tell you why but out of my > >> feeling, all those antennas described remind me on the well-known > >> Beverage-Antenna system. > >> > >> Two wires of any layout, diameter, height and length terminated by a > >> "resistor"...the soil. > >> > >> Could that be a way we could look at this kind of antenna? > >> And if so, what would it explain? > >> > >> 73 > >> OE3GHB > >> Gerhard > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >