Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A905538000110; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 04:14:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U5YON-0002hR-MK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:12:39 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U5YOM-0002hI-St for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:12:38 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U5YOK-0002EK-V7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:12:37 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmkKANJXG1FOk8de/2dsb2JhbABEqG+FDJFrA4EFF3OCGgUBAQUIAQEDSQIsAQEDBQIBAwQNBAEBCiUUAQQaBhYIBhMKAQICAQGHbwMTv0yMNYIEIIMqA4gwhVeYcIMG X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,655,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="408802737" Received: from host-78-147-199-94.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.199.94]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 13 Feb 2013 09:12:15 +0000 Message-ID: <002e01ce09ca$35f6bed0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <70BF6EFD7BD24968AF887B68D484EE9D@White> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:12:12 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 3.8 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Markus It is very rare for someone to have a QSO on LF these days. I normally use CW for that distance and during daytime. I have seen a good trace from SV8CS a while back. What you have done was normal some years back. Try CW next time gl de mal/g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (3.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 3.8 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: c8ff00257edaad8e124ab9389da9609a Subject: LF: Re: QSO SV8CS - DF6NM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002B_01CE09CA.35A0FDB0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60ce511b596625ce X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002B_01CE09CA.35A0FDB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Markus It is very rare for someone to have a QSO on LF these days. I normally use CW for that distance and during daytime.=20 I have seen a good trace from SV8CS a while back.=20 What you have done was normal some years back. Try CW next time gl de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Markus Vester=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 10:59 PM Subject: LF: QSO SV8CS - DF6NM Spiros SV8CS and myself just had our first LF QSO. It was a difficult = start, due to deep and long QSB and very active thunderstorms over the = Ionian sea. After seeing just nothing in the first attempt, we decided = to slow down to qrss / dfcw 60. Fortunately around 21:35 propagation = suddenly picked up, and we could complete the contact with a comfortable = 25 dB SNR. Thank you very much Spiros for this nice contact, and your patience = while mastering adverse conditions. Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) PS Mal, never say again that no one can be bothered to conduct an LF = QSO any more ;-) ------=_NextPart_000_002B_01CE09CA.35A0FDB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Markus
It is very rare for someone to have a QSO on LF = these=20 days.
I normally use CW for that distance and during = daytime.=20
I have seen a good trace from SV8CS a while = back.=20
What you have done was normal some years back. = Try CW next=20 time
gl de mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Markus=20 Vester
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, = 2013 10:59=20 PM
Subject: LF: QSO SV8CS - = DF6NM

Spiros SV8CS and myself just had = our first LF QSO. It was a difficult start, due to deep and long = QSB=20 and very active thunderstorms over the Ionian sea. After seeing = just=20 nothing in the first attempt, we decided to slow down to = qrss /=20 dfcw 60. Fortunately around 21:35 propagation suddenly = picked up,=20 and we could complete the contact with a comfortable 25 dB = SNR.
 
Thank you very much Spiros for this = nice contact,=20 and your patience while mastering adverse conditions.
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 
 
PS Mal, never say again that no one = can be=20 bothered to conduct an LF QSO any more ;-)
 
------=_NextPart_000_002B_01CE09CA.35A0FDB0--