Message-ID: <002e01c95fa9$3111c650$6c01a8c0@DELL4>
From: <jrusgrove@comcast.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <000b01c95ed5$a2cda180$4201a8c0@home>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:07:42 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: Re: Re: whisper
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Jim

I'm interested....if you can keep it running until at least 2300Z.

Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Moritz" <james.moritz@btopenworld.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 11:53 AM
Subject: LF: Re: whisper


> Dear Uwe, LF Group,
>
> I downloaded the WSPR software last night and attempted to receive your
> beacon - but not until after 2300utc, at which time I could not see your
> sigs at my QTH or on DF6NM's grabber. Not suprisingly I didn't get any
> decodes of your signal, but did see lots of bogus exotic DX on the output
> screen, especially when the Luxembourg effect noise was strong! Looking at
> the spectrogram, there is a permanent weak carrier close to 136.000kHz 
> (also
> seen and heard at many other QTHs I believe), so perhaps not the best QRG.
> I did notice there is a null in the sidebands from the Hungarian 135.4kHz
> station at about 135.975kHz, so that might be a better frequency for 
> tests.
>
> I can't transmit the WSPR signal on 136k at the moment, but could do on
> 500kHz - anyone interested?
>
> Cheers, Jim Moritz
> 73 de M0BMU
>
>