Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10088 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2003 11:12:20 -0000 Received: from netmail01.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.219) by mailstore with SMTP; 1 Apr 2003 11:12:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 26699 invoked by uid 10001); 1 Apr 2003 11:12:19 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Apr 2003 11:12:19 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 190Jeh-00059q-TH for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2003 12:10:15 +0100 Received: from [62.253.162.46] (helo=mta06-svc.ntlworld.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 190JeQ-00059c-Tq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2003 12:09:59 +0100 Received: from mike1 ([80.4.107.45]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP id <20030401110957.BNMS20605.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@mike1> for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:09:57 +0100 Message-ID: <002e01c2f83f$6840cae0$2602a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 12:11:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: 73kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0tests=noneversion=2.51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.51 (1.174.2.5-2003-03-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Lots of 73kHz activity today: My second attempt at QSO with GM0MRF failed as they still have local QRM. Was being heard by MI0AYZ at similar distance (475km) so not my end. Had normal CW QSO with G3YXM. Also worked G3WKL - a comparative newcomer to transmitting on 73kHz - exchanging 'O' reports on QRSS3. Good signal from G3GRO in Cornwall, audible at about S4, but they are giving G3AQC an 'M' report so little chance of them seeing my signals. Looks like they also have a noise problem. I know from my own experience in GW, it is much more difficult to set up an ad hoc station on 73kHz than on 136kHz, so I can sympathise with their problems. Mike, G3XDV http://www.lf.thersgb.net ====================