Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 36C5238000603; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:05:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1R1MTp-0000e4-Cl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:04:09 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1R1MTo-0000dv-Vy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:04:08 +0100 Received: from out1.ip09ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.245]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>) id 1R1MTm-0002nr-3l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:04:08 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aj0BAO6xZ05cHn6t/2dsb2JhbABDFoh5j1pDjkF5gUEFAQEEAQgBAQMlARYNAiYGAQEDBQIBAxEEAQEBCSUUAQQaBhYIBhMKAQICAQGHZAICt1+GawSHPZ0L X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,346,1312153200"; d="scan'208";a="489666885" Received: from host-92-30-126-173.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.30.126.173]) by out1.ip09ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 07 Sep 2011 19:03:46 +0100 Message-ID: <002d01cc6d88$7af5a300$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> References: <4E6695F9.8060402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <E1R16r2-0007AM-99@post.thorcom.com> <4E6727E8.5040508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <E1R1HAA-0008U8-Ep@post.thorcom.com> <4E676569.5030207@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <E1R1Hla-000611-S6@post.thorcom.com> <4E6776EC.8090202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <E1R1K0z-0000gd-Mo@post.thorcom.com> <4E67989F.9040000@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <E1R1M0w-0006Tk-8k@post.thorcom.com> <4E67AF85.7000002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 19:03:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: beaconing to the west II ...and to the east, north and south... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:468105664:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc1454e67b2604712 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan Is your grabber RX site remote from ur TX because my signal on ur grabber is nearly as strong as yours de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:53 PM Subject: Re: LF: beaconing to the west II ...and to the east, north and south... > Thanks Bill ;-) The webpage looks fine! :-) > > At G4WGT i can see Mal TXing nearly 136.172. Will he join in? Oh, it > seems i really have to finish that PA supply ;-) > Looking forward to that evening! Unfortunately there will be some rain > it seems. That may cost a dB or so... > > 73, Stefan > > > > > Am 07.09.2011 19:34, schrieb Bill de Carle: > > OK Stefan, you got it. Thanks for even setting the UTC offset > > correctly for my QTH! I'll leave it running overnight. > > > > www.nrtco.net/~ve2iq/grabs/ > > > > At 12:15 PM 9/7/2011, Stefan DK7FC wrote: > >> Hello Bill, > >> > >> Well, ok then i would configure SL like in the attached file (without > >> the specific setting to upload the captures to your grabber page). I > >> would prefer the noiseblanker instead of the clipper. It can be > >> configured very precisely (since version b18 and newer). > >> You could run two instances with your settings from yesterday and my > >> usr file simultaneously, just for fun and to see if there is an > >> improvement... > >> I think i would rather use a wide SSB filter instead of the narrow CW > >> filter. The noiseblanker works better then. BTW this could be a > >> disadvantage of my narrow ferrite antenna! > > >