Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp57072igc; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:46:40 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.202.230 with SMTP id kl6mr10914221wjc.9.1387140398506; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:46:38 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gr6si3927461wjc.148.2013.12.15.12.46.38 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:46:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VsI08-0003Xq-EL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:09:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VsI07-0003Xh-II for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:09:19 +0000 Received: from qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.56]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VsI03-0007rt-JB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:09:18 +0000 Received: from omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.88]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 1vU11n0021uE5Es56w9DFB; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:09:13 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta16.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 1w9D1n00G0CFS1j3cw9DmN; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:09:13 +0000 Message-ID: <002c01cef9d1$8611d600$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <52ACA468.8070907@gmx.de> <00a101cef8fe$a1854350$6402a8c0@pa3fnyb8313412> <52ACB684.4040709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52AD2C90.4070101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52ADD9C8.2000700@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 15:09:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1387138153; bh=mCxzyrfB789RhL7WOz2B1m4h6x7JTZjbfklQ+EM6u0Y=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=jju59sK/lm/8Ob0hgz222ea61RxuXQcO8ZEFHgkNW7RX6UquXDiQ3oepr+0Igpkxx v5V+l4kFUcpgIuXsSezLqiOcUBLmI6rtCg6N0IO+z20Y7H1oIRCLbfJlCg6nv8Yh43 YYFdGfRASHoldjFLubDMqpD79ZvlZd7CIEY0rhgHRromzbjDXO52s4Rv1B/KuxY92F r/9liOxKG7EsX3lnd27OZ8v0wkHBOl04joAhCHWHGyYGOgyd6FAwbSbyPJsLfm09xG QcrWNhihf0XGA3LwZbkB9FK2bXgwzN0rpC2UzVoQsxHbczwulsuWkQMqxhCC4YZgXe qTFPYrmUfrGEw== X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan What is the overall antenna R now? With the kite of years gone by? Miss reading and seeing the pictures of your escapades in the field. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.56 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: e4d79cc1e5beb0f7c63f6aa3ce129e10 Subject: Re: LF: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2154 Stefan What is the overall antenna R now? With the kite of years gone by? Miss reading and seeing the pictures of your escapades in the field. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XRS/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: ; "Paul" Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 11:33 AM Subject: Re: LF: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC Hi Peter, VLF, Did you see a trace on your grabber? Can you show me a link or a screenshot? The signal is well visible on Paul Nicholson's excellent VLF grabber, http://abelian.org/vlf/fbins.shtml#p=1387116000&b=110&s=sp but far from stable. Is instability is due to my signal of course. Distance to Paul is 880 km, http://no.nonsense.ee/qth/map.html?qth=IO83XQ&from=jn49ik00wd You are right, there are many things to optimise. One thing is the housing of the PA. Now it is just mounted on a wooden plate. It is a H bridge using 4x IRFP460, switching directly at 230V*1.41, so the output of the PA is on mains potential! There is no galvanic decoupling transformer on the output (which would allow to use a grounded coax then) because such a transformer would have to be a VERY big ferrite core with many many turns (> 100). So the PA output is directly connected to the primary winding of the loading coil, which couples its field into the resonance winding (1200 turns). So the feed line is floating on an unknown voltage which depends on the capacitive coupling to sourrounding things. In the field experiments 2010/2011 this was no problem. But now it is. I guess this is causing EMC problems to the /2 frequency divider, sometimes. Thus, i will put it into a metallic box which is grounded to earth potential. Another problem is the parallel capacitor which i have to add to come on resonance. It's capacity is not high enough and i have to add about 10m or wire hanging arround. This additional wire is moving in the wind blasts and causes further instability of the signal (kind of AM due to modulated resonance peak, i.e. antenna current). Another way would be to add more turns to the coil but this antenna system is voltage limited and it doesn't matter at all if i have to put 400W or 500W into the system. BTW this night/day it was 850 mA antenna current and about 400W RF power. I will plan to do more QRO, when the new capacitor is ready to use. Here is an image of the arrangement, taken 30 minutes ago: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/VLF/20131215_165406.jpg As soon as the C of "DK7FC" is finished, i will run some OPDS32 sequences for DF6NM and Paul Nicholson and others :-) BTW i have disconnected my VLF grabber antenna since the RX is overloaded anyway. Now it is easier to identify eventual phase glitches (could be on the RX side as well, though). 73 and thanks for watching. Stefan/DK7FC Am 15.12.2013 14:49, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter: > Stefan, > Signal is O.K., but stabillity is'nt :-( > To much spread around center frequency. > > (I know.... I'm complaining about 0.01 Hz drift..........) > > 73's Peter > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" > To: ; "Paul" > Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 4:14 AM > Subject: Re: LF: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC > > > Since 4:10 UTC, the signal is available without interruptions now on > 8.97000500 kHz. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 14.12.2013 20:50, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: >> Hi all, >> >> Tomorrow the rain probability is just 10% and so i think i can risk to run a short VLF experiment >> on 8970.00500 Hz. I'm using the fixed antenna at JN49IK00WD. These days, the QRN is very low for >> quite a long time! The plan is to run about 500W RF power, or more, depending on the voltage >> limit of the antenna. And the plan is to start transmitting tonite, after the experiment with >> VO1NA, i.e. i'll come on air arround 2 UTC, hopefully. I will run the test until the late >> afternoon. First i'm TXing a stable frequency until 9 UTC, later some DFCW-600, and then maybe >> some tests in OPDS32. >> Suggestions welcome. >> BUT it all depends on the WX. If it starts to rain then i have to stop. >> Will someone give it a try and watch for me? >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >