Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dg11.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dg11.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.19]) by air-df02.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDF023-5ee84cc1e083a0; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:05:39 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg11.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CFE8D380001AC; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 15:05:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P9Muc-0002iI-4I for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:04:22 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P9Mub-0002i6-Kx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:04:21 +0100 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P9MuY-0003Mk-MR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:04:21 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAIZ8wUxOk8sl/2dsb2JhbACQCQORXHG/IoIagzAEgVyMC4JS X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,224,1286146800"; d="scan'208,217";a="476050050" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.203.37]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 22 Oct 2010 20:04:12 +0100 Message-ID: <002c01cb721b$e616f9e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:04:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0029_01CB7224.4780E5D0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41134cc1e0816351 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01CB7224.4780E5D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andy But no restrictions across the channel where NOV'S are not needed and= they can blast away QRO if desired, does'nt make sense. 10w erp would be more realistic in the UK on 9 Kcs=20 g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Andy Talbot=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 7:55 PM Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV received today Of the four exclusion zones, three are obvious, presumably sferics= receivers spread across the UK. Exeter - the MO itself; =20 Eskdalemuir, and =20 Wick in the Shetlands=20 are AFAIK normal monitoring points. The remaining one is near Roseworthy, west of Camborne, Cornwall. = Wonder why that's in the exclusion zone? Seems too close to Exeter= to be useful. Andy www.g4jnt.com On 22 October 2010 14:06, Roger Lapthorn = wrote: This morning I received my NoV from OFCOM to operate legally aroun= d 9kHz. Details are: Duration: 1 year Frequencies allowed: 8.7kHz - 9.1kHz=20 Modes: Not specified (long periodic time= modes preferred by the Met Office) Power: 100mW EIRP Notification: Have to get Met Office written perm= ission before operating and keep logs (to send to the Met Office) Location: Home QTH or others with prior Met= Office approval (4 UK locations have 4km exclusion zones) No firm plans yet when I'll start local tests on this band, but wi= thin a couple of weeks with QRP WSPR and QRSS. I'll put a copy of the NoV on my website in the next few hours. 73s Roger G3XBM --=20 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01CB7224.4780E5D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Andy
But no restrictions across the channe= l where=20 NOV'S are not needed and they can blast away QRO if desired, does= 'nt make=20 sense.
10w erp would be more realistic in th= e UK on 9 Kcs=20
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Andy Talbot
Sent: Friday, October 22, 201= 0 7:55=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 8.97kHz NoV= received=20 today

Of the four exclusion zones, three are obvious,  pres= umably=20 sferics receivers spread across the UK.
 
Exeter - the MO itself;  
Eskdalemuir,  and  
Wick in the Shetlands 
    are AFAIK normal monitoring points.
 
The remaining one is near Roseworthy, west of Camborne, Cornwal= l. =20 Wonder why that's in the exclusion zone?   Seems too= close to=20 Exeter to be useful.
On 22 October 2010 14:06, Roger Lapthorn <r= ogerlapthorn@gmail.com>=20 wrote:
This=20 morning I received my NoV from OFCOM to operate legally around=20 9kHz.

Details are:

Duration:  = ;           &nb= sp;       =20 1 year
Frequencies allowed:   8.7kHz - 9.1kHz= =20
Modes:        &= nbsp;           = ;   =20   Not specified (long periodic time modes preferred by the Me= t=20 Office)
Power:       =            &nbs= p;     =20 100mW=20 EIRP
Notification:      &n= bsp;          =20 Have to get Met Office written permission before operating and kee= p logs (to=20 send to the Met=20 Office)
Location:      &nb= sp;           &= nbsp;  =20 Home QTH or others with prior Met Office approval (4 UK locations= have 4km=20 exclusion zones)

No firm plans yet when= I'll start=20 local tests on this band, but within a couple of weeks with QRP WS= PR and=20 QRSS.

I'll put a copy of the NoV on my website in the next= few=20 hours.

73s
Roger G3XBM


=
--=20
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
G3XBM  =20 GQRP 1678    ISWL=20 G11088

------=_NextPart_000_0029_01CB7224.4780E5D0--