Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mj12.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mj12.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.21.164.96]) by air-me04.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINME043-8bae4cb5d5441a8; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:50:28 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj12.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 38F36380000EC; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:50:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P63ZY-0004TJ-M7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:48:56 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P63ZY-0004TA-8o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:48:56 +0100 Received: from out1.ip08ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.244]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P63ZW-0005LU-MM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:48:56 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmoIAFJxtUxcEY29/2dsb2JhbACHZYtzjXZxvTiFSASNWg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,326,1283727600"; d="scan'208";a="464191651" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.17.141.189]) by out1.ip08ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 16:48:47 +0100 Message-ID: <002c01cb6aee$1da0a8a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <000c01cb6abb$719bb6d0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <9BC685267F7D463C959F12E846B1E6F2@JimPC> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:48:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: Re: Ground proximity antennas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039400c89b84cb5d5426c4c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Jim I am sure a beverage would perform over good ground but to what degree would it be less efficient than over poor ground. Any bit of metal, wire etc will radiate something like the proberbial bed springs or hook up to your central heating radiator system. Try this and you will be heard probably several miles away but that is hardly the way to proceed, likewise apart from having fun Ground Promimity Antennas are no substitute for a real elevated antenna up as high as possible especially on LF/MF regarding DX Working DX is not an isolated fete, there are others doing likewise on the band so one is aware what is going on and I have never failed to hear the DX that others are hearing/working some with beverages but most without. A proper half wave or 1/4 wave vertical antenna or full size one wave loop erected at a optimum height or as near as possible on the band of interest is hard to beat or better still at the higher frequencies a multi ele yagi or quad array. 73 Mal/G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 1:57 PM Subject: LF: Re: Ground proximity antennas > Dear Mal, LF Group, > > G3KEV wrote: > ...>Antennas described on here recently on or near the ground are only > variations of Beverage antennas and inefficient for Transmitting... > > This is missing the point. I think the interesting questions about such > antennas are: > > -Achieving great enough antenna height to make an LF antenna that is > actually "efficient" is usually impossible for amateurs. Sometimes it is > possible to erect a very long, but low height antenna, so does this form of > antenna have advantages in efficiency or otherwise over a short, low height > antenna? What is the best way of using such antennas? > > -The text-book explanation of Beverage antenna operation, including that low > ground conductivity is neccessary for proper operation, etc. is not very > convincing to me - I don't really believe that such an antenna over a > perfect ground plane would fail to radiate or receive any signals. So in > what mode to such antennas actually operate? > > G3KEV also wrote: > ...>I have never missed any DX signals by not having one. > > Ahh, but how would you know? You can't prove the negative... Maybe that > prime DX station was calling, calling, calling, but to no avail due to your > deaf antenna ;-) > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > >