X-GM-THRID: 1238085650986705924 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.172.11 with SMTP id u11cs81026hue; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 13:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.40.12 with SMTP id s12mr1816955ugj.1180816736232; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 13:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f7si4768881nfh.2007.06.02.13.38.52; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 13:38:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) DomainKey-Status: good (test mode) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1HuaGa-0002TW-8A for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 21:32:04 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1HuaGZ-0002TN-LO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 21:32:03 +0100 Received: from smtp802.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.62]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HuaGY-0006HO-NT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 21:32:03 +0100 Received: (qmail 62858 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2007 20:31:57 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=pp6naGrQcer6tDrEQ7bqplqapMFGT7txRhXfLY3a6PmV30cxnUWk8QdmWxQk0Godb/IjHeyUuZJ3jDnQFSPTM0+1EGOrgytoi28LMLQjXKfmusxXC3eQcEyX+C6Xk8Ly7pU+ZMg7Vd4Up186j88HsRICZtVNQ88QNQjCAVm9DhM= ; Received: from unknown (HELO lark) (alan.melia@btinternet.com@81.131.54.16 with login) by smtp802.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Jun 2007 20:31:56 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 1QjnMFoVM1lpbQzLIu3HEi2W57tZTLdiS8YZjSs473.Dn6iK8fjDFiqafcyCgxxCLNvGacTZJA-- Message-ID: <002b01c7a555$118e7360$0300a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <20070602171709.IPF84992@lon1-mailstore-2.visp.demon.net> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 21:03:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Rugby Loran to cease Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1514 Hi Peter, i think (by anecdote) the TVs radiate the signal from their aerial braid and can be reduced if not cured by a braid breaker in their aerial lead close to the set. (Gen for that from a "near" neighbour to you G3XDV. I have heard one comments that said that if they applied for a licence now for that mode it would be refused !! It may be what the Yanks call the wall-wart on the DVD that is causing the trouble in which case substitue in linear supply with the same capacity. I am fairly clear now on 500k most of what I found when my aerial was on the floor was self generated (PCs) now the wire is elevated a little 6m the noise situation is much better. I have been using Alberto's WinRad on a multiturn loop straight into the sound card to look from "zero" to 48kHz (96k sampling card) for SMPSU fundamentals. I do get some spill 50Hz sidebands from the 16th harmonic of the line timebase at 500.000 kHz but its not too bad now. Good luck with the "negotiatiions" Cheers de Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: 02 June 2007 17:17 Subject: Re: LF: Rugby Loran to cease > Thanks for the info Alan. > > It's very loud here on 136 I suppose I have less to complain > about compared to Dave. When the narrow filters are in its > not really noticable. Its such a an awfull spreading signal > just imagine what Ofcom would do to us if we created a > similar racket. (not much of a chance that with 1W ERP or > 0.1W ERP available). > > Ok on the RX potential a useful tip. > > My current fight is with HD LCD TVs made in Turkey and Korean > DVDs flattening 500kc/s if any one has called me recently and > I've not come back it's because of the very high S9 racket > from these devices. I am working on a compromise with the > owner, my grown up son. > > Well hope to hear you on 502kc/s in the near future .... 73 > petefmt >