Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14783 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2003 08:00:58 -0000 Received: from marstons.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.223) by mailstore with SMTP; 1 Apr 2003 08:00:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 8108 invoked by uid 10001); 1 Apr 2003 08:00:58 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by marstons.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Apr 2003 08:00:58 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 190Ggd-0003Jf-Bu for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2003 09:00:03 +0100 Received: from [62.253.162.42] (helo=mta02-svc.ntlworld.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 190GgV-0003JJ-KN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 01 Apr 2003 08:59:55 +0100 Received: from mike1 ([80.4.107.45]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP id <20030401075954.HNSN9882.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@mike1> for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 08:59:54 +0100 Message-ID: <002b01c2f824$ecb39b60$2602a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 09:01:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: RE: GAIN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.8 required=5.0tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCESversion=2.51 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.51 (1.174.2.5-2003-03-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false > Heck Bill even made a loop that was > 25 feet by 25 feet and it still made it several hundred miles on less than a > watt. Series resonate it and run the right ferrite cored transformer. No > exceptions. > Mike>WE0H I have seen people use 'series' and 'parallel' resonating when talking about loops, but what is the difference - surely if it is a continuous loop they are both the same? Can someone clarify, please. Mike, G3XDV http://www.lf.thersgb.net ====================