Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mj04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mj04.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.21.164.88]) by air-mf06.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINMF062-8bee4c542ddd3bb; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:06:21 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mj04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2C1E73800009D; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:06:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OfCgT-0001XD-Dn for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:05:05 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OfCgS-0001X4-Ts for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:05:04 +0100 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OfCgR-0001c4-Vw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:05:04 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At8GAKbKU0xcHYA8/2dsb2JhbACHWZhNcb4ihTkEi08 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,295,1278284400"; d="scan'208";a="307991370" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.29.128.60]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 31 Jul 2010 15:04:56 +0100 Message-ID: <002a01cb30b9$5a904b40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <4C51FA69.1030202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4C529C6B.9070908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4C53EB92.4000806@legal-medicine.de> <4C53F284.7070307@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <2E9DD091D9BA490C9600B92540A7B616@JimPC> Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 15:04:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: VLF: DK7FC's 6th VLF kite experiment Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039400c89a84c542ddc131f X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jim Can u see any trace on 8.97 at present mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" To: Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 2:38 PM Subject: Re: VLF: DK7FC's 6th VLF kite experiment > Dear Stefan, LF Group, > > I have been doing some receiving checks <9kHz, and althought the QRN= level > is quite high, the level of man-made noise at my home QTH seems to= be much > lower than during the last set of tests. So I should be able to have= quite > good receiving conditions for DK7FC's tests tomorrow without having= to go to > a /P location. > > Around 6.5kHz there are some weak (n x 50Hz) spectral lines drifting around, > and a few more stable lines visible, which may be internal to the PC= . This > is similar to the situation at 8.97kHz, so I am hopeful that at leas= t the > receiver will be reasonably sensitive ;-) > > Good luck with the test tomorrow, > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" > To: > Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2010 10:53 AM > Subject: Re: VLF: DK7FC's 6th VLF kite experiment > > > > Hello Peter, > > > > Better say 6,6 +-200 Hz. It is still not certain where the resonan= ce will > > be, sorry. There are to many assumtions, estimations and calculati= ons. > > > > On 137 kHz the measured C for 100m is 580pF (measured with a RC br= idge and > > by measuring the L and calculating C). But EZNEC shows a lower C.= This > > could be, since a 100m vertical is not absolutely short against La= mbda and > > so the sems to occur some impedance transformation which "looks/be= haves" > > like a higherC. > > > > On <9 kHz the 100m wire IS short against lambda and so i loose thi= s > > benefit. There, the actual C is present. The L of my variometer pa= rt in > > the BIG coil is estimated to be 30 mH. Maybe it is even more and= the > > overall L is higher than L(coil)+L(variometer) due to the better magnetic > > coupling. So maybe i have less C and more L than thought on 8,97. > > > > When doubling the antenna height from 100m to 200m and assuming 5= pF/m the > > C is doubled as well. So i thought i will come out at 6,34 kHz > > (8,97/sqrt(2)). But this may just a rough estimate. EZNEC says the= C > > factor is not 2 but 1,88 so i would come out some 100 Hz above. > > > > So the question is: > > What is the actual antenna C for 100m > > What is the actual (maximum and average) L > > What is the C factor when going from 100m to 200m > > > > This are many uncertainties and so i didn't want to tap the coil= at 70% of > > the winding to come back to 8,97 kHz but first just to measure out= where > > the resonance will be, to solve these open Questions. Of course,= another > > important and very interesting issue is propagation in the 46km ba= nd! :-) > > > > So, sorry for that coarse frequency range. Maybe the actual QRG wi= ll be > > written here in the reflector and can be seen on my garbber2 but= first > > lets hope for proper WX! > > > > 73 and tnx, Stefan/DK7FC > > > > > > > > Am 31.07.2010 11:23, schrieb pws: > >> Hi Stefan, > >> > >> Question: do you have a realistic guess of the frequency window= of your > >> transmission around 6.5kHz, e.g. +-100Hz? > >> > >> You wrote: > >> > >>> .... > >>> on *Sunday, the 1. August*, i will make a new kite experiment. > >>> ... > >>> i will transmit at arround *6,5 kHz, > >>> ... > >>> Starting time is* 8 UTC*, maybe some time later > >>> ... > >>> TX QTH is as usual in JN49IS, 49.77647N 8.699525. > >>> > >> Distance is 516km, heading 10deg. to Kiel. > >> > >> Just modified the software running at ~17mHz of resolution. Anten= nas are > >> two crossed ferrite loops feeding some BC550 in parallel buffered= by > >> NE5532. Both amplifiers are connected to a M-Audio Audiophile 192 running > >> at 24 kHz on an Intel Atom 330 "shoe-box" under Linux. > >> > >> 73 from Baltic Sea, > >> Peter > >> > > > >