Return-Path: Received: from mtain-md07.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-md07.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.91]) by air-mb07.mail.aol.com (v126.13) with ESMTP id MAILINMB073-a7a34b695cce18b; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:23:58 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-md07.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4ACAF38000062; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:23:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NcdJb-0002ym-8Z for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:22:35 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NcdJa-0002yd-RR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:22:34 +0000 Received: from qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.48]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NcdJY-0006ij-Em for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:22:34 +0000 Received: from omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.87]) by qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id dP5r1d0011swQuc55PMgt2; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:21:40 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([76.23.233.102]) by omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id dPPZ1d0022DDHkk3bPPZTi; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:23:34 +0000 Message-ID: <002a01caa4c3$28d86a10$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <12077821.1264946261487.JavaMail.root@wamui-cynical.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1ACF@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <4C25D51A6FE646D5B8D9D37C87EA6BBC@lindavideo> <02E3EF3F48994AB88A1489042CE7EA02@JimPC> <284438.50947.qm@web87001.mail.ird.yahoo.com> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1AD5@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <00a101caa471$beaf7530$1bb2a8c0@vp2fc459c0ffcf> <20100203082523.6D257F3862@smtps02.kuleuven.be> <003001caa4b1$c5b831b0$0217aac0@desktop> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:22:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55 Subject: LF: Re: RE: QRP on 500kHz Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d605b4b695ccc02fc X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Jim Have been looking for your WSPR signal whenever you're active. The lowest ERP from EU received here so far was +20 dBm from G0NBD...about a dozen spots over several nights. Distance was 5198 km. The spots were in the -22 to -25 SNR range so reception of a station that is 6 dB below G0NBD should be possible. Please transmit whenever you can - there are at least several stations on this side of the pond that routinely keep an eye on 502.4 kHz. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Cowburn" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 4:17 AM Subject: LF: RE: QRP on 500kHz > Rik/LF > > That too has been my experience. With 10W out (approx 50-100mw erp) I can > work 1000km stations on WSPR with SNRs of around -20dB to -25dB. If I > switch to low (1W so approx 5mW or less) I can still be copied by M0LMH at > 200km and John PG in the Shetlands (916km) at -29dB, also LA3EQ (800km) and > others in D/F. > > Similarly in the recent dry spell I was getting around 12 to 15w into > antenna, now it is wet that has dropped to 10W. Sub-optimally I am using a > silver birch tree as the support for my inverted L and will likely be > suffering losses due to the wire running close to the trunk and then over a > bough and out thru the branches. A job for summer is to use a better > support away from trees! > > Curiously my mid range reports are the ones that disappear on QRP and the > local ground wave signals collapse > > Obviously it has a lot to do with the noise at the Rx end too, if not more > so than the output at the tx end > > My best dx to date on wspr mode is 1200km out to Lubos when he set up a > quiet RX location but TF/SV/SP would be good. I'm sure that with right > condx and 10w there is enough in the link budget at 50mw to 100mW to get to > 2000km or so. > > If I can reiterate a plea from Roger G3XBM, if there are any 500KHz > enthusiasts reading this who are in the range 1500km to 2500km from IO/JO > squares, even if only on Rx then let us know when you are monitoring and we > can see just how far more modest stations can get with QRo/QRP/QRPp. > > > > > With best regards > > > Jim > > > Dr. James Cowburn G7NKS IO92ub > > Icom 706mk2G, 10W inverted L 6m/30m > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Rik Strobbe > Sent: 03 February 2010 08:26 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: QRP on 500kHz > > In the past I had noticed that my antenna detuned several kHz during rain. > As it was raining last night (not a bit) I took the chance to do some > antenna measurements using low power (25W input, about 15W output). > Due to the bad SWR the antenna current was only 0.3A, estimated ERP about > 20mW. > At one moment I unintentionally started a CQ instead of giving a > carrier (hitting the wrong button on the keyer) but decided to let it > run while noting the measurement results in my "lab book". > To my surprise I was called by Finbar (EI0CF) and had a nice QSO with > him, receiving a 559 report. > Condx on 500 last night seemed average to me. > Conclusion: with a few Watt in a modest antenna (lazy-L, 11m high and > 25m long) one can work 1000km (or more) in CW on 500kHz. > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > >