Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28797 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2000 11:38:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 15 Dec 2000 11:38:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 13116 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2000 11:33:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 15 Dec 2000 11:33:26 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 146sv4-0003Vi-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 11:20:58 +0000 Received: from mta1-win.server.ntli.net ([62.253.164.41] helo=mta1-svc.virgin.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 146sv3-0003Vd-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 11:20:57 +0000 Received: from p.cleal ([62.252.38.134]) by mta2-svc.virgin.net (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with SMTP id <20001207181400.BAQQ265.mta2-svc.virgin.net@p.cleal> for ; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 18:14:00 +0000 Message-ID: <002a01c06079$a42b8a00$8626fc3e@p.cleal> From: "Peter Cleall" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: the old LF source book Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 18:10:28 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: >Sounds like the LF source book of a couple of years ago. Most of the >information was obsolete and bore no resemblence to the achievements taking >place when it was published. I think 23 km was the record when in fact I had >worked OH1TN and got 579 on normal morse when it went to print. >G3KEV I do not understand why you have to be so rude about the source book. When it was published I believe it was a genuine attempt to get the best information that was available, and easily reproducible, quickly out to the interested beginners. I for one have constantly referred to various sections of it, often going back and picking up a few more nuggets by re reading. Surely that is the purpose of a source book. Records by their very nature are transient things which most of us appreciate, will, at some stage, be overtaken. The technical content however can be reused. As shown by our use of of documentation of LF work done in the 1920's to 1950's. peter G8AFN