Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9467B38000162; Thu, 31 May 2012 14:28:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SaA5q-0003ok-U3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 19:27:30 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SaA5q-0003oY-Ah for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 19:27:30 +0100 Received: from qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SaA5n-0004gx-QP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 31 May 2012 19:27:29 +0100 Received: from omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.72]) by qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id GcGC1j0011ZXKqc5DiTRSN; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:27:25 +0000 Received: from DELL4 ([71.234.119.9]) by omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id GiTQ1j01F0CFS1j3hiTQj7; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:27:24 +0000 Message-ID: <002801cd3f5b$067ecec0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> From: To: References: <8BE4322932454ABBAF36917E7F0B7293@uwePC> <4FC74C16.1050905@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4FC75239.6090105@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <000601cd3f2d$7877fca0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <4FC76ECD.8040401@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <002f01cd3f35$a45c6e70$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <4FC79E2E.4070101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 14:27:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Well ... guess you have already answered your own question ;~) I've stuck with transformer coupled designs ... VMCD for 137 / 500 kHz and CMCD for 160 / 75 / 40 meters. I don't have much experience with the bridge circuits which I believe is what you normally use. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.59.243 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: c0e6e8bcdc231effb9da2003d606d9a2 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Current mode class D PA for 475 kHz - success Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:476926816:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d61894fc7b8462dbb X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan Well ... guess you have already answered your own question ;~) I've stuck with transformer coupled designs ... VMCD for 137 / 500 kHz and CMCD for 160 / 75 / 40 meters. I don't have much experience with the bridge circuits which I believe is what you normally use. Without a load at the transmitter output both types behave well - they act as though they aren't even keyed. I've mistakenly keyed them into incorrect loads (antennas for other bands) with no ill effects. Operating into impedances other than 50 ohms cause a shift in the drain voltage/current ratio as expected ... so there are limits. From experience a 1.5:1 VSWR during normal operation isn't a concern. The ringing on the off FET drain is an issue with VMCD and is mainly due to leakage reactance of the transformer. In my experience, this is best minimized by choosing a core material that provides enough winding reactance for the frequency in use without going overboard. For my 137 kHz KW transmitter (yet to be written up) I used an FT-240-78 core. 78 material was specifically developed for the frequency range between 100 and 200 kHz and works excellent. These cores are standard parts. For my 500 kHz KW transmitter (yet to be written up) I used an FT-240-79 core. 79 material is even better than 78 material at 500 kHz. Unfortunately, these are not readily available - 79 is a newer material and available in only a few sizes that aren't conducive to what we're doing. I parted with some NRE money last year and got Fair Rite to make some FT-240-79 cores for me. Last I checked they hadn't added it to their catalog ;~( Even with the correct core material and winding technique (interleaved primary and secondary windings) some form of snubber from each drain to source is required. Choosing the correct R and C is an interesting exercise. Rather than go over it here check out this paper by Rudy Severn: http://www.ee.bgu.ac.il/~pel/links/DESIGN_OF_SNUBBERS_FOR_POWER_CIRCUITS.pdf BTW, Rudy is one of the WD2XSH 500 kHz group. He also has a You Tube videos on the subject ... and a book as well. In my experience the ringing is not a problem as long as it is controlled and well under the voltage limits of the FET. In my KW VMCD the drain square wave is 100 V (2 X supply voltage (50VDC)) and the first peak of the ringing voltage brings this up to about 140 V. The FETs in use here are 240 volt parts. Jay ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 12:37 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Current mode class D PA for 475 kHz - success > Jay, MF, > > I just tried the CMCD and immediately achieved 89% efficiency at 12VDC and 36W RF at 475 kHz > (dummy load). Just a first result. I can answer my own question now: Without a load the PA behaves > not critical! The current consumption is 0.2A only (including the current of the VFO and exciter) > !! :-) I'm going to improve the design now and will publish some photos soon... > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 31.05.2012 15:59, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: >> Stefan >> >> Thanks for the positive comments. >> >> Have to admit I haven't been following what you're up to ... curious what problems you're running >> into with VMCD at 500 kHz? >> >> Jay >> >> >