X-GM-THRID: 1205769496006773115 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 73ce78a9af75eee97371300ecc0a5ad39e37e81d Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.127.17 with SMTP id z17cs30528wrc; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 20:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.92.15 with SMTP id u15mr2940693nfl; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id q28si3951041nfc.2006.06.09.20.49.59; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 20:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FouQh-00065F-Ob for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:46:31 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FouQh-000656-9v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:46:31 +0100 Received: from olympus.pncl.co.uk ([195.224.180.233] helo=olive.pncl.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FouQe-0004kK-Jb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:46:31 +0100 Received: from AUG2004 (cpc2-leat1-0-0-cust386.hers.cable.ntl.com [86.3.121.131]) (authenticated bits=0) by olive.pncl.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k5A3inTB005034 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:44:49 +0100 Message-ID: <002801c68c40$26f60210$0200a8c0@AUG2004> From: "Walter Blanchard" To: References: <330.5e3d5ff.31bb25b5@aol.com> <4489E374.5040800@verizon.net> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:44:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Pinnacle-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Pinnacle-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: blanch@pncl.co.uk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.024,HTML_60_70=0.027,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY=0.045 Subject: LF: JITO Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0025_01C68C48.8668B1E0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5284 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C68C48.8668B1E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I suspect this was the problem ICOM had with the early 706's which used = DTCXO's and were really poor but the later 706 Mk 2's substituted a = traditional TCXO and were much better. Walter G3JKV. Original: David,=20 yes indeed, some measurements we made a few years ago did indicate = that the phase noise can be fairly high.=20 It all depends, of course on whatever application you are = contemplating. 73 Andr=E9 N4ICK ------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C68C48.8668B1E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I suspect this was the problem ICOM had with the early 706's which = used=20 DTCXO's and were really poor but the later 706 Mk = 2's substituted=20 a traditional TCXO and were much better.
Walter G3JKV.
 
Original:
David,=20
yes indeed, some measurements we made a few years ago did indicate = that=20 the phase noise can be fairly high.
It all depends, of course on = whatever=20 application you are contemplating.
73
Andr=E9 N4ICK = ------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C68C48.8668B1E0--