Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 13EEB380000B6; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 04:04:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SbSFm-0000rR-L6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 09:03:06 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SbSFm-0000rI-4A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 09:03:06 +0100 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SbSFj-0005Il-Va for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 09:03:04 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAFAI1rzE9cF/bI/2dsb2JhbABFnlOVUIEIghMFAQEFCAEBA0kCLAEBAwUCAQMRBAEBCiUUAQQaBhYIBhMKAQICAQGHfrYdixEghXADjT2QfoZWgmCBVw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,711,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="540258771" Received: from host-92-23-246-200.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.246.200]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 04 Jun 2012 09:03:02 +0100 Message-ID: <002701cd4228$764d60c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <4FCB96A9.4010009@usa.net> <4FCB9F34.7040604@legal-medicine.de> <4FCBCC8B.9050308@usa.net> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 08:03:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I prefer any information of interest to me to be stored on my computer and not some central storage outside my control. The advantage of individual storage is that not all the eggs are in one basket in the event of a major crash, virus infections etc at central storage. I prefer individuality and self control and not being dictated to by others. I have read recently where some organisations are encouraging individuals to use their computers as terminals and store all their personal information at a central location. In my opinion this is not the way to proceed. Think of the disadvantages, NO CONTACT AVAILABLE because of cable faults, crash at storage centre , maintainence, virus infection etc With your own storage you have immediate access at all times without third party interference. Some individuals would believe anything and follow like sheep. g3kev . [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.242 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.5 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: b2000330e4064ca60a9f57e731b892da Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0024_01CD4228.75E21BD0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:401477408:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d61864fcc6bf04baf X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0024_01CD4228.75E21BD0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I prefer any information of interest to me to be stored on my computer = and not some central storage outside my control. The advantage of individual storage is that not all the eggs are in one = basket in the event of a major crash, virus infections etc at central = storage.=20 I prefer individuality and self control and not being dictated to by = others. I have read recently where some organisations are encouraging = individuals to use their computers as terminals and store all their = personal information at a central location. In my opinion this is not = the way to proceed. Think of the disadvantages, NO CONTACT AVAILABLE = because of cable faults, crash at storage centre , maintainence, virus = infection etc With your own storage you have immediate access at all times without = third party interference. Some individuals would believe anything and follow like sheep. g3kev . =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Alberto di Bene=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org ; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk=20 Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 8:43 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Getting rid of Black Sheep On 6/3/2012 7:30 PM, pws wrote:=20 I'm running Beagle on Gnome for indexing and search for any kind of information stored locally. Postings, images and other "information" which are "Googleable" or "Yapooable" will be more a problem than a feature in the future. There's only one advantage using those modern, advertisement driven open systems. You always have to keep in mind: "don't post when coming from pub." So, please tell me what is "outdated" here? What is outdated is the fact that to use your technique of finding = relevant contents, one would be forced to store everything locally.... then of course any = decent tool like Google Desktop can index and find what one is interested in. IMHO, it is much more intelligent and rationale to have a central = repository, where everything is archived, instead of duplicating on each user PC all the = past messages of the group. 73 Alberto I2PHD ------=_NextPart_000_0024_01CD4228.75E21BD0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I prefer any information of interest to me to be = stored on=20 my computer and not some central storage outside my = control.
The advantage of individual storage is that not = all the=20 eggs are in one basket in the event of a major crash, virus infections = etc at=20 central storage.
I prefer individuality and self control = and not being=20 dictated to by others. I have read recently where = some organisations=20 are encouraging individuals to use their computers as terminals and = store all=20 their personal information at a central location. In my opinion = this is not=20 the way to proceed. Think of the disadvantages, NO CONTACT = AVAILABLE=20 because of cable faults, crash at storage centre , = maintainence, virus=20 infection etc
With your own storage you have immediate access = at all=20 times without third party interference.
Some individuals would believe anything and = follow like=20 sheep.
g3kev
.  
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Alberto di = Bene=20
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2012 = 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: = [rsgb_lf_group]=20 Getting rid of Black Sheep

On 6/3/2012 7:30 PM, pws wrote:=20 
I'm running Beagle on Gnome for indexing =
and search for any kind of
information stored locally.

Postings, images and other "information" which are "Googleable"
or "Yapooable" will be more a problem than a feature in the
future.

There's only one advantage using those modern, advertisement
driven open systems. You always have to keep in mind:
"don't post when coming from pub."

So, please tell me what is "outdated" here?
What is outdated is the fact that to use your technique = of finding=20 relevant contents,
one would be forced to store everything = locally.... then=20 of course any decent tool
like Google Desktop can index and find = what one=20 is interested in.

IMHO, it is much more intelligent and = rationale to=20 have a central repository, where
everything is archived, instead of = duplicating on each user PC all the past messages of
the=20 group.

73  Alberto =20 I2PHD

------=_NextPart_000_0024_01CD4228.75E21BD0--