X-GM-THRID: 1215974039374463637 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: bf07229496a8fb5f1de60ecc3f94580469011368 Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.78.205.5 with SMTP id c5cs27983hug; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 05:10:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.100.17 with SMTP id c17mr1818856ugm; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:10:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s7si763355uge.2006.10.05.05.10.07; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:10:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) DomainKey-Status: good (test mode) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1GVS08-0003bm-Hf for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:06:56 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1GVS08-0003bd-10 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:06:56 +0100 Received: from smtp804.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([217.146.188.64]) by relay2.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GVS03-0006u0-MD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:06:55 +0100 Received: (qmail 73753 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2006 12:06:45 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=a8v+jRST3cdTE+zj/p9FoZ+gPPmyUdpkmB66ogqiavuJrP4Z7UDzp9ZtLigLtzRRKEjZ8cOwPBYAIDuLojMjcjbUbt1qS7cttHrzZuL8AicZrztMuseVp+KHeN9sez3adBo7AU2MJo7WXQP2ePWXj+CXG8aX/5UxSVmRJ8x7pdY= ; Received: from unknown (HELO lark) (alan.melia@btinternet.com@81.131.123.198 with login) by smtp804.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Oct 2006 12:06:45 -0000 Message-ID: <002701c6e876$ba5d4ee0$0300a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:06:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.698 Subject: Re: LF: Strange signal 500khz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4477 Hi Gary, I dont know how they work but I would suggest the digibox is deriving a linescan rate from the received digital TV signal periodically and it applying that to the analogue signal it generates to send to you old set, what you are seeing are the "corrections".... a bit like a digital PLL. Interesting......That means the signal you are receiving is probably generated by the set's line scan circuit. It might be interesting to put a braid breaker on the aerial to the digibox ( of the TV) and see if the coax braid is radiating the signal. Cheers de Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: Gary - G4WGT To: Sent: 05 October 2006 12:43 Subject: RE: LF: Strange signal 500khz Hi Alan, Markus & LF, Here is an interesting result, I wrote :- " I believe that the stepping effect is probably due to the "Freeview" digi-box because the TV is an older analogue model & I would expect a steady (ish) interference with no prominent stepping. I will do some tests with & without the digi-box. " After watching the mid-day news today whilst monitoring 500KHz using SpecLab I switched off the digi-box & the stepped interfering line stopped, I then switched the digi-box back on & the line returned as I expected, now I switched the TV off leaving the digi-box on & the line stopped again. So it is not generated solely by the digi-box but a combination of both the TV & the digi-box being on. Comments invited. Regards, Gary - G4WGT.