Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AAE1538000092; Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:50:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SsNt3-00039E-CY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 01:49:37 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SsNt2-000395-Lq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 01:49:36 +0100 Received: from qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.48]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SsNt0-0002AQ-MJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 01:49:35 +0100 Received: from omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.44]) by qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id cgsA1j00F0xGWP855opbWN; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 00:49:35 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id copH1j00L0CFS1j3YopHu4; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 00:49:17 +0000 Message-ID: <002501cd66da$b151e390$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <30610FF92B7843A9A5178679FBDFF229@gnat>, <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FAE4097@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> <1342810732.77309.YahooMailNeo@web171602.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <15CFB3EF6DDE4A099F4B77426DC55591@gnat> <713B457CDC1F446E94318E98042C42F6@AGB> <5009DC2C.3090003@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1899012C849A4EC785403CD11686C99E@AGB> <5009EA1D.2000106@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:49:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan DST had improved earlier to around -20 nT but has dropped back to -35 nT. This does not bode well for reception tonight ... but I'd be happy to be proven wrong. Recommend sticking with OP8 for 'local' work for tonight. Seem to recall I received Opera from EU last winter on both 137 and 500 kHz so it's only a matter of time until we succeed. [...] Content analysis details: (1.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.7 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D X-Scan-Signature: c8ff00257edaad8e124ab9389da9609a Subject: LF: Re: T/A Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0021_01CD66B9.29FB2440" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:475555936:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40845009fcd47783 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0021_01CD66B9.29FB2440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Stefan DST had improved earlier to around -20 nT but has dropped back to -35 nT. This does not bode well for reception tonight ... but I'd be happy to be proven wrong. Recommend sticking with OP8 for 'local' work for tonight. Seem to recall I received Opera from EU last winter on both 137 and 500 kHz so it's only a matter of time until we succeed. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: Stefan Schäfer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 7:30 PM Subject: LF: T/A Am 21.07.2012 01:10, schrieb Graham: Ok Stefan Yes , can see that peak , may be a change to OP32 would decode in the day ? , if nothing else it should extend the decode windows ! but that would need a little pre-warning to ensure all monitors have changed over , would be interesting with the band 'closed' to see if the extra dB's + time , managed to decode in the USA /Canada , but I assume dfc39 is monitored as well , is it showing ? No idea if someone in the US east coast monitors DCF39 continuously. From my impressions about the chances of W1VD as the receiving station and me as the transmitting station there would be a realistic chance for a decode in the tonights condx. Jay, what is your opinion? 73, Stefan ------=_NextPart_000_0021_01CD66B9.29FB2440 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
Stefan
 
DST had improved earlier to around -20 = nT but has=20 dropped back to -35 nT. This does not bode well for reception tonight = ... but=20 I'd be happy to be proven wrong. Recommend sticking with OP8 for 'local' = work=20 for tonight. Seem to recall I received Opera from EU last winter on both = 137 and=20 500 kHz so it's only a matter of time until we succeed.
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  = WE2XGR/2
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Stefan = Sch=C3=A4fer
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 = 7:30 PM
Subject: LF: T/A


Am 21.07.2012 01:10, schrieb Graham:=20
Ok  Stefan
 
Yes  , can  see  that  peak , may  be = a =20 change to  OP32  would  decode in the  day = ? , if=20 nothing  else  it  should  extend the  = decode =20 windows !   but that  would  need  a = little =20 pre-warning  to  ensure  all  monitors = have =20 changed  over ,  would  be  interesting  = with=20 the  band  'closed'  to  see  if the =20 extra  dB's  + time  , managed to  decode = in =20 the  USA /Canada , but  I assume   dfc39  = is =20 monitored  as well  , is it  showing =20 ?

No idea if someone in the US east coast = monitors DCF39=20 continuously.
From my impressions about the chances of W1VD as the = receiving station and me as the transmitting station there would be a=20 realistic chance for a decode in the tonights condx.
Jay, what is = your=20 opinion?

73, Stefan
------=_NextPart_000_0021_01CD66B9.29FB2440--