Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EB22D38000091; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 05:49:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1S2Kby-00045G-EI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:48:50 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1S2Kbx-000457-Vh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:48:49 +0000 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1S2Kbv-00020o-Pe for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:48:49 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgIFAG+wTE9Ok80c/2dsb2JhbABCnTwDlieBCIFuBQEBBAEIAQEDSAECJgYBAQMFAgEDBwoEAQEKJRQBBBoGFggGEwoBAgIBAQ6HYgmoZ5A4iRCDaxAWAVsLAQGFAA8yAQUIAQYIAwQDBguDLQSCXYU/hTqTAodX X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,495,1325462400"; d="scan'208,217";a="386530876" Received: from host-78-147-205-28.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.205.28]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 28 Feb 2012 10:48:42 +0000 Message-ID: <002501ccf606$88f8b8a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <74845C11BC3444D79B63A207E428BDE0@lindavideo><005701ccf561$cd9d4250$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><098856018E3A46AB96BA9F9FC6C8FFCD@JimPC><4F4C793C.25633.1363DE@dave.davesergeant.com> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:48:41 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0022_01CCF606.88B87B50" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:474319520:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60ce4f4cb13a0141 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0022_01CCF606.88B87B50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andy This statement sounds like a self confessed Appliance Operator Amateur = you could at least try CW for a while. Intensely dislike seems strong. I = even tried Opera and do not dislike it or any Data mode but I prefer CW = where the skill of the operator is evident when communicating instead of = pressing GREEN for tx and RED for stop and AMBER for wait incase of a = DECODE as in Appliance Operator. I would encourage you to get a morse key and have a Go, one has to be = positive !! g3kev =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Andy Talbot=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 10:10 AM Subject: Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation That''s OK Dave, if Mal's opinion won the day, then this amateur would = never use the band. I will not use Morse. I intensely dislike it So = one way or the other one of us would populate the frequency. =20 However, more than likely commone sense will prevail, as it always = seems to in the Am bands and operating in this country, 'jnt =20 On 28 February 2012 06:50, Dave Sergeant = wrote: If such a rule built into the permits for this band then this = amateur for one will never consider using it. 73 Dave G3YMC On 28 Feb 2012 at 0:02, James Moritz wrote: > So there is > a strong argument for amateurs not to use morse code at all in = this > frequency range. It would be better to use totally different types = of > transmission that would not be confused with a NDB beacon signal. > http://www.davesergeant.com ------=_NextPart_000_0022_01CCF606.88B87B50 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Andy
This statement sounds like a self confessed = Appliance=20 Operator Amateur you could at least try CW for a while. Intensely=20 dislike seems strong. I even tried Opera and do not dislike = it or any=20 Data mode but I prefer CW where the skill of the operator is = evident when=20 communicating instead of pressing GREEN for tx and = RED for=20 stop and AMBER for wait incase of a DECODE as in Appliance=20 Operator.
I would encourage you to get a morse key and = have a Go,=20 one has to be positive !!
g3kev
 
  
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Andy=20 Talbot
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, = 2012 10:10=20 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: NDBs & = WRC-12 LF=20 band allocation

That''s OK Dave, if Mal's opinion won the day, then this amateur = would=20 never use the band.  I will not use Morse.  I intensely = dislike=20 it   So one way or the other one of us would populate the=20 frequency. 
 
However, more than likely commone sense will prevail, as it = always seems=20 to in the Am bands and operating in this country,
 
'jnt


 
On 28 February 2012 06:50, Dave Sergeant = <dave@davesergeant.com>=20 wrote:
If=20 such a rule built into the permits for this band then this = amateur
for=20 one will never consider using it.

73 Dave G3YMC

On 28 Feb 2012 at 0:02, James Moritz = wrote:

> So=20 there is
> a strong argument for amateurs not to use morse = code at all=20 in this
> frequency range. It would be better to use totally = different=20 types of
> transmission that would not be confused with a NDB = beacon=20 signal.
>


http://www.davesergeant.com


<= /DIV>
------=_NextPart_000_0022_01CCF606.88B87B50--