Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B329C38000095; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 16:11:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1T9Lvz-0003P3-PP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:10:47 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1T9Lvu-0003Ol-UM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:10:42 +0100 Received: from out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T9Lvs-0000Yi-SI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:10:41 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsARAIqxR1BcHnSX/2dsb2JhbABFhgWELq9lAQKBCYEIghsFAQEFCAEBAxYPASMCJgYBAQMFAgEDEQQBAQMCBSECAhQBBBoGFggGEwoBAgIBAYdtAxCnY4ktC4lVgSGJcBV9XIF4ggqBEgONXpgVgmOBWQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,375,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="46598944" Received: from host-92-30-116-151.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.30.116.151]) by out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 05 Sep 2012 21:10:32 +0100 Message-ID: <002401cd8ba2$7e4d7260$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <5046503B.3050904@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <836728322-1346785992-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-2129170870-@b17.c17.bise6.blackberry> <50465556.5000909@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5046872C.90307@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50476D85.7040909@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <504771F5.5060703@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <6C924F177A9B4E439DA1E5EDE0352C4A@AGB> Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 20:10:27 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Graham Switched over to the main 500 khz 1/4 wave inv L antenna and signal now +2 dB. Other antenna was the 40 metre Vert Quad Loop max sig N/S so DK7FC was not optimum direction. de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham" To: Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 7:50 PM Subject: Re: LF: MF acty [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.243 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: fb3e28a759dea7e01d34d3fe7de7ae98 Subject: Re: LF: MF acty Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60095047b20c0ed9 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Graham Switched over to the main 500 khz 1/4 wave inv L antenna and signal now +2 dB. Other antenna was the 40 metre Vert Quad Loop max sig N/S so DK7FC was not optimum direction. de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham" To: Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 7:50 PM Subject: Re: LF: MF acty > 19:46---DK7FC de SWL-G3KEV (England): Op4 515 mi -6 dB in SCARBOROUGH <<< > not showing on my Op screen ? > > 19:42 477 DK7FC Op4 -13 dB........Full Dark > 19:38 477 DK7FC Op4 -18 dB > 19:34 477 DK7FC Op4 -17 dB > 19:29 477 DK7FC Op4 -16 dB > 19:25 477 DK7FC Op4 -22 dB > 19:21 477 DK7FC Op4 -23 dB > 19:17 477 DK7FC Op4 -17 dB > 19:13 477 DK7FC Op4 -21 dB > 19:09 477 DK7FC Op4 -22 dB > 19:05 477 DK7FC Op4 -23 dB > 19:00 477 DK7FC Op4 -28 dB > 18:56 477 DK7FC Op4 -25 dB........Full Daylight > *********** 05/09/2012 *********** > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Graham" > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 7:59 PM > To: > Subject: Re: LF: MF acty > > > Just walked in the room and beep :) > > > > 18:56 477 DK7FC Op4 -25 dB > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > From: "Graham" > > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 6:44 PM > > To: > > Subject: Re: LF: MF acty > > > >> 17:42 477 DK7FC de M0LMH Op4 536 mi -25 dB in Harrogate > >> 17:42 477 DK7FC de DK8IZ Op4 9 mi +2 dB in nr Heidelberg > >> > >> Heidelberg , Harrogate , but nothing past my garden gate :) > >> > >> Still monitoring but not a beep as of yet > >> > >> G. > >> > >> -------------------------------------------------- > >> From: "Stefan Schäfer" > >> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 4:38 PM > >> To: > >> Subject: Re: LF: MF acty > >> > >>> > >>> Am 05.09.2012 17:19, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > >>>> [...]but as soon as the sunrise comes, no signals are detected in the > >>>> UK while the levels are 25 dB above the decode limit in the night. > >>> Ehm, no, i've concentrated to much on the plot of G0KTN while writing > >>> that. M0LMH even get's daytime decodes on the lower limit, maybe having > >>> a somehow better RX-system+location(?)... > >>> > >>> 73, Stefan > >>> > >> > > >