Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21559 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2001 09:35:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 28 Apr 2001 09:35:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 10751 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2001 09:35:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 28 Apr 2001 09:35:31 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14tQpN-0000t2-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 10:15:45 +0100 Received: from mail4.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.193.211]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14tQpL-0000ss-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 10:15:43 +0100 Received: from modem-33.pajama-cardinal.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.45.161] helo=g3aqc) by mail4.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 14tQop-0005LW-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2001 10:15:12 +0100 Message-ID: <002401c0cfbb$5e5c11a0$a12d893e@g3aqc> From: "Laurie Mayhead" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re. DFCW Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 09:06:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Thanks Alberto for your excellent picture of my sigs, and comments. This pic. is better than my local monitoring ! but of course there is no noise visible,and I guess it is this which blurrs the inter- element gaps. Also if the signal energy in the blurring areas was in the actual element there would no doubt be an increase in readability. But I appreciate this is very difficult to achieve without very accurate timing. . Anyway I shall try out your ideas.

73s Laurie