Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18463 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2001 10:57:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by extortion.plus.net with SMTP; 15 Mar 2001 10:57:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 16797 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2001 10:57:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 15 Mar 2001 10:57:19 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14dVLv-0001ke-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:51:31 +0000 Received: from rubellite.lion-access.net ([212.19.217.4]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 14dVLu-0001kZ-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:51:31 +0000 Received: from w8k3f0 (JohnMajor.Leaders.dialup.freeler.nl [212.26.216.222]) by rubellite.lion-access.net (I-Lab) with SMTP id 894A028F0 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:50:50 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <002301c0ad36$0df0d4a0$ded81ad4@w8k3f0> From: "Dick Rollema" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <16005567.984503931546.JavaMail.imail@chilly.excite.com> <004601c0ac7d$58993920$32d41ad4@w8k3f0> <000501c0acad$b595ffc0$2d2f883e@robing> Subject: LF: VR136 = EF50? Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:51:15 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: To All from PA0SE Robin T. Greenwood wrote: > I think it was known as an EF54? You are right! In a list of equivalent valves I found VR136 = RL7 And then in another list RL7 = EF54. Thanks Robin! 73, Dick, PA0SE > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dick Rollema" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 11:52 AM > Subject: Re: LF: Re. E88cc in parallel > > > > To All from PA0SE > > > > John, G4CNN wrote: > > > > That's my memory too - i.e. the red or aluminium cans were EF50s. Why some > > were red I don't think I ever knew. > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > Is it not so that the red EF50 was the original one, developed by Philips > at > > Eindhoven for television treceivers? Just before Germany occupied The > > Netherlands on May 10th, 1940, info on the production of the EF50 was > passed > > to on Mullard. > > > > The aluminium military equivalent of the EF50 was the VR136, which was > used > > in for instance tuning units of the Gee set; one as RF amplifier, one as > > a mixer and a VR137 triode as oscillator. > > > > 73, Dick, PA0SE > > > > > > > > > > >