Message-ID: <002301c09a94$903e1940$c7a0883e@g3aqc>
From: "LAWRENCE MAYHEAD" <laurie@g3aqc.freeserve.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <015d01c09a82$e85849a0$0d0e0805@globocabo.com.br>
Subject: LF: Re: Some signals
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:53:22 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Hi Marcus, my frequency  since 01/01/01 has been 135.921.7/8 so its possible
some of your "hits" were me, which would be terrific. most stations have
been clustered  between .920 and 923. ,keep up the good work 73s
Laurie.----- Original Message -----
From: "PY3CRX PY2PLL" <py2pll@py.qsl.br>
To: "LF Group" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 2:47 PM
Subject: LF: Some signals


> Hi ...
>
> I think I got some signals when monitoring 135.920. I set up Argo to watch
> from 800Hz (135920) to 806Hz (135926), 60 second dot, slow.
>
> Unfortunately, it's summer here so static crashes are really a problem,
> peaking -60dBm sometimes. My noise floor is -128dBm durying daytime.
>
> After some days I could select 2 or 3 snapshots where I "wish" to see some
> traces. One of them seems to be at 135921,7. There are others.
>
> I'm not shure but is there any freq alocation table (who's where?).
>
> No decode at all but seems that there's something showing up. The days
when
> this traces are more visible was the same where 153KHz BC was strong here.
>
> I'm not watching 137789,4 yet because my antena doesn't have a good
coverage
> to
> NA (10dB less than at EU direction).
>
> 73
> Marcus
> PY3CRX/PY2PLL
> S. B. do Campo - GG66rf
> http://py.qsl.br
> Active from "DC" to 24GHz
>
>
>
>
>