Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10912 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2001 07:32:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 21 Jun 2001 07:32:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 12827 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2001 07:31:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 21 Jun 2001 07:31:26 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15Cyp7-0006xQ-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:24:17 +0100 Received: from latimer.mail.uk.easynet.net ([195.40.1.40]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15Cyp6-0006xL-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:24:16 +0100 Received: from ericadodd (tnt-18-135.easynet.co.uk [212.134.224.135]) by latimer.mail.uk.easynet.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D7520536ED for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:23:32 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <002201c0fa23$de3e5440$87e086d4@ericadodd> From: "g3ldo" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000f01c0f8a6$b6efc3c0$f57674d5@w8k3f0> Subject: LF: Re: Protection against lightning Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:24:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Dick Rollema said: > When not in the shack I leave the aerial floating in the hope that it will > be charged to the voltage potential of its surrounding so that lightning > won't "see" it. > Or is that a misconception? In a discussion with Arnie, CO2KK, regarding this subject he said that in areas of tropical storms antennas were best ungrounded and all equipment disconnected from the antenna, ac supplies and even from ground. However there should be provision for flashover to ground (at some distance from the shack if possible) if the antenna static potential becomes excessive. An ungrounded antenna reduces the potential gradient in the area above the antenna. In Kenya I used a rhombic which used to collect static that flashed over to the metal window frame if there was a wind (and sometimes rain). If there was a thunderstorm in the vicinity I used to disconnect the feeders from the ATU and throw them out onto the ground outside. My 60ft mast in Sierra Leone was hit by lightning one night - it seemed that the room was filled with a blinding blue flash accompanied by a loud crack. All the lights went out. I went into the pantry (to check the electrical fuse boxes etc ) and all that I could see were wires sticking out of the wall and bits of bakelite and annealed copper on the floor. All electrical equipment not connected to the ac supply, including the radio, survived. The ac supply was fed to the house via overhead wires that probably made the situation worse. At this QTH the mast is folded over most of the time so the same sort of situation does not arise. Although the above experience had made me rather paranoid about lightning I try to tell myself that the chances of a normal QTH with a TV antenna being hit (in the UK) has been estimated to be once every 400 years. Regards, Peter, G3LDO e-mail Web