Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 067AE38000092; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 04:24:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SdzuK-0005iK-Ds for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:23:28 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SdzuJ-0005iB-MO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:23:27 +0100 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SdzuH-0002qf-Ev for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:23:26 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqcFAMup1U9Ok8rY/2dsb2JhbABFnwaEf5BVgQiCEwUBAQUIAQEDSQIsAQEDBQIBAxEEAQEKJRQBBBoGDAoIBhMKAQICAQGHbAMPtzyKRmGCToMbA40+kl6EfYJg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,387,1336345200"; d="scan'208,217";a="541108807" Received: from host-78-147-202-216.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.202.216]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2012 09:23:23 +0100 Message-ID: <002101cd47ab$75b09960$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <004201cd4730$cc020860$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <57131D54FA1241D8BBE53212C31F7BF0@Shack> <006601cd473d$d4da5cf0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <0AE0F5F0-4E73-42A7-B7D4-8EAA5DD84524@thelortons.co.uk> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:23:19 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Clive Poor turn out with 167 members and only 57 voted. 70% of 57= 39.9 members for Yahoo I will manage with or without a reflector, LF es MF because of the very poor band occupancy is but a small part of my amateur radio activities. I will be more interested in 6m es 10m when the bands really open up during sunspot max For a beginner on LF or MF the amount of QSO acty is so poor it does not justify the effort required to get a station operational. 73 mal/g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.242 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: f9bb43a66658129469273581af35b296 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Votes Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001E_01CD47AB.7566BF20" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:502244896:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db40a4fd5ab5b5ed5 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001E_01CD47AB.7566BF20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Clive Poor turn out with 167 members and only 57 voted. 70% of 57=3D 39.9 = members for Yahoo I will manage with or without a reflector, LF es MF because of the very = poor band occupancy is but a small part of my amateur radio activities. = I will be more interested in 6m es 10m when the bands really open up = during sunspot max=20 For a beginner on LF or MF the amount of QSO acty is so poor it does not = justify the effort required to get a station operational. =20 73 mal/g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Clive Lorton=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 8:13 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Votes Mal, you have Yahoo sussed to be able to read the results. But only 2 = - G3's voted. What a shame=85 Still listining Still lurking Cliveg g8poc=20 On 10 Jun 2012, at 20:18, mal hamilton wrote: Ok Tony But two thirds of the members did not vote, g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: Tony To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 6:15 PM Subject: LF: Re: Votes 70% Yahoo 10% Black Sheep 19% Continue with both No idea who the other 1% is ;-) Tony, EI8JK ----- Original Message ----- From: mal hamilton To: rsgb Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 5:45 PM Subject: LF: Votes Well Only 57 votes and 167 members of the Yahoo group. Out of 57 how = many voted for Yahoo. This does not look convincing that Yahoo was the = way to go. g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_001E_01CD47AB.7566BF20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Clive
Poor turn out with 167 members and only 57 = voted. 70% of=20 57=3D 39.9 members for Yahoo
I will manage with or without a reflector, LF es = MF=20 because of the very poor band occupancy is but a small part of my = amateur radio=20 activities. I will be more interested in 6m es 10m when the bands=20 really open up during sunspot max
For a beginner on LF or MF the amount of QSO = acty is so=20 poor it does not justify the effort required to get a station = operational.=20   
73 mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Clive=20 Lorton
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 = 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: = Votes

Mal, you have Yahoo sussed to be able to read the = results. But=20 only 2 - G3's voted.
What a shame=85

Still listining Still lurking

Cliveg g8poc 

On 10 Jun 2012, at 20:18, mal hamilton wrote:
Ok Tony
But two thirds of the members did not=20 vote,
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Tony
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 = 6:15=20 PM
Subject: LF: Re: Votes

70% Yahoo
10% Black Sheep
19% Continue with = both
 
No idea who the other 1% is = ;-)
 
Tony, EI8JK
 
----- Original Message = -----
From: mal hamilton
To: rsgb
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2012 = 5:45=20 PM
Subject: LF: Votes

Well
Only 57 votes and 167 members of the = Yahoo group.=20 Out of 57 how many voted for Yahoo. This does not look = convincing that=20 Yahoo was the way to go.
g3kev
=
 

------=_NextPart_000_001E_01CD47AB.7566BF20--