Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11892 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2000 18:33:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO warrior-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.227) by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Dec 2000 18:33:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 22441 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2000 18:27:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by warrior with SMTP; 10 Dec 2000 18:27:57 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 145B79-0002td-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:22:23 +0000 Received: from email.cwcom.net ([195.44.0.104] helo=cwcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 145B78-0002tY-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:22:22 +0000 Received: from computer ([195.44.5.168]) by cwcom.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:20:34 +0000 Message-ID: <002101c062d8$d8b6f1e0$a8052cc3@computer> From: "Martin M5CIX" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1834.200012091431@gemini> <3A33C181.AC1383AD@bellatlantic.net> Subject: Re: LF: CFA Antennas Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:41:40 -0000 Organization: M5CIX / G8CIX MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: The link does not seem to work. Martin M5CIX > Hello Friends, > John Belrose (Communications Research Centre, Ottawa) > presented a paper at the Millennium Conference on > Antennas and Propagation Davos Switzerland, 9-14 April 2000, entitled "The > Crossed Field Antenna - Analyzed by Simulation and Experiment" in which he > describes a numerical simulation and some experiments he conducted on 3657 > KHz. > His conclusions are essentially that "the CFA is a very inefficient > radiator" and that "the excellent operational performance claimed by the > inventors of the CFA is an enigma." > > see also http://members.home.net/propagation/cfa2.rtf > > 73 > Andre' N4ICK > > >