Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4113F3800009F; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:28:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tfxgj-0002HQ-5B for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:57:49 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.34] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tfxgi-0002HF-Nw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:57:48 +0000 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfxgh-0007EM-9F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:57:47 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AloFAOVFvlBOk8jk/2dsb2JhbABEpmkDl0IXc4IZBQEBBQgBAQNJAiwBAQMFAgEDBA0EAQEKJRQBBBoGFggGEwoBAgIBAYgDsEWQXow3gRqDJwOIKoVPmFGCcg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,217,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="411599641" Received: from host-78-147-200-228.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.200.228]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 04 Dec 2012 18:52:24 +0000 Message-ID: <002001cdd250$7c9be2e0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <001201cdd24a$1cd92c60$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 18:52:18 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 3.8 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay2.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Still good signals but no decodes at present. Notice some qsb on signals and think op 32 is too slow with signal breaking up. My opinion, if these signals were QRS I could easily copy and get an ID ----- Original Message ----- From: mal hamilton To: rsgb Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 6:06 PM Subject: LF: 137 [...] Content analysis details: (3.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 3.8 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: b1e5ebccbad86c8ca1fd46d24f0285de Subject: LF: Re: 137 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001D_01CDD250.7C62AA70" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1da60550be4ed736de X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001D_01CDD250.7C62AA70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Still good signals but no decodes at present. Notice some qsb on signals = and think op 32 is too slow with signal breaking up. My opinion, if these signals were QRS I could easily copy and get an ID ----- Original Message -----=20 From: mal hamilton=20 To: rsgb=20 Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 6:06 PM Subject: LF: 137 Plenty of Opera acty on 137 but not always a decode, some acty = seems faster than op32 on waterfall.=20 Now on big antenna de mal/g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_001D_01CDD250.7C62AA70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Still good signals but no decodes at present. = Notice some=20 qsb on signals and think op 32 is too slow with signal breaking = up.
My opinion,  if these signals were QRS I = could easily=20 copy and get an ID
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 mal=20 hamilton
To: rsgb
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, = 2012 6:06=20 PM
Subject: LF: 137

    Plenty of Opera acty on 137 = but not=20 always a decode, some acty seems faster than op32 on waterfall. =
Now on big antenna
de mal/g3kev
 
------=_NextPart_000_001D_01CDD250.7C62AA70--