Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=193.82.116.20;
Message-ID: <002001c7e015$d503f590$0e00000a@AGB>
From: "Graham" <g8fzk@g8fzk.fsnet.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <000701c7e00c$d96bf9b0$15e4fc3e@g3kev>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:57:47 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: Re: 600 V 160
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Would have to  be at night, 1.8  wont travel that well during the day ?

G ..


---- Original Message ----- 
From: "hamilton mal" <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>
To: "rsgb" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 2:53 PM
Subject: LF: 600 V 160


> Hi all
> It would be interesting to try both bands at the same time over a given 
> path
> to compare propagation.
> I am using a 1/4 wave inv L on each band, both at the same height, and can
> run the same pwr if anyone else would like to try it.
> This could be a useful experiment for OFCOM purposes to justify more RF on
> 600 metres.
> 73 mal/g3kev
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/955 - Release Date: 8/15/2007 
> 16:55
>
>