Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14534 invoked from network); 1 May 2003 18:31:57 -0000 Received: from netmail01.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.219) by mailstore with SMTP; 1 May 2003 18:31:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 25807 invoked by uid 10001); 1 May 2003 18:25:17 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 1 May 2003 18:25:17 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 19BIjb-0005RV-7p for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 May 2003 19:24:43 +0100 Received: from [194.73.73.81] (helo=tungsten.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 19BIjQ-0005RL-Md for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 May 2003 19:24:32 +0100 Received: from host213-122-78-134.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([213.122.78.134] helo=Main) by tungsten.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #23) id 19BIjM-00068l-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 May 2003 19:24:29 +0100 Message-ID: <002001c3100e$ed6658c0$6507a8c0@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000c01c30f29$700bc080$bbe4fc3e@l8p8y6> <003201c30f4f$ee182a60$6507a8c0@Main> <001601c31001$6ff450c0$bee5fc3e@l8p8y6> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 19:24:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: strange condx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.7 required=5.0tests=ORIGINAL_MESSAGE,REFERENCESversion=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false ----- Original Message ----- From: "hamilton mal" To: Sent: 01 May 2003 17:47 Subject: LF: Re: Re: strange condx > Hi Mal, well yes it does look like "exploding FET Syndrome" is a better explanation that mine !! A reduction to just 7 watts would certainly explain things. It just goes to show that all changes in signal strength are not due to the propagation ...even though it is a bit dismal at the moment. Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com