Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22077 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2002 22:49:58 -0000 Received: from netmail01.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.219) by mailstore with SMTP; 18 Dec 2002 22:49:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 28353 invoked by uid 10001); 18 Dec 2002 22:49:55 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 18 Dec 2002 22:49:55 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18On0F-0003my-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:49:23 +0000 Received: from [62.253.164.42] (helo=mta2-svc.business.ntl.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18On0A-0003mp-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:49:18 +0000 Received: from jackie ([217.137.95.35]) by mta2-svc.business.ntl.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20021218224519.WHLN21072.mta2-svc.business.ntl.com@jackie> for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:45:19 +0000 Message-ID: <002001c2a6e7$adbe9600$235f89d9@jackie> From: "Steve Thompson" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <004001c2a6c8$8c75de00$74e9fc3e@l8p8y6> <001401c2a6d9$13882a00$482965d5@oemcomputer> <000e01c2a6db$0d7f7260$09dc9384@jka> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:49:08 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: jason etc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group ----- Original Message ----- From: John Andrews To: Sent: 18 December 2002 21:18 Subject: LF: Re: Re: jason etc > > and a similar antenna at the receiving end instead of small loops or 3 > feet active type antennas. > > Just curious -- since the signal to noise ratio in my receiving installation > appears to be limited by external (man-made and atmospheric) noise, rather > than noise in my preamp/receiver, how would a 100 foot tower improve that > situation? Think how clearly you'd be able to hear the noise :-) Steve