Return-Path: Received: from mtain-dh01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-dh01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.65.21]) by air-df02.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDF023-5ee84c1eb1673ca; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:25:11 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-dh01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 993E938000097; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:25:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1OQUnj-00011j-6A for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 01:23:47 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1OQUni-00011a-Kf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 01:23:46 +0100 Received: from out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OQUng-0006Ev-M1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 01:23:46 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAMNNHkxcEY7a/2dsb2JhbACPJQOPX3G/coUbBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,449,1272841200"; d="scan'208,217";a="450955460" Received: from unknown (HELO your91hoehfy9g) ([92.17.142.218]) by out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 21 Jun 2010 01:23:37 +0100 Message-ID: <001f01cb10d7$fdb80620$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <006c01cb109f$08f7e7a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 01:23:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: 137 band Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001C_01CB10E0.5F112930" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41154c1eb16449e9 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01CB10E0.5F112930 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roger I am only quoting how the band has been used since the beginning ie th= is is how it evolved. The band has been 100% CW and QRSCW until recent= ly.=20 This band was not intended for spread spectrum modes to suit appliance= operators. I do not recall any discussion about a RSGB band plan and= the RSGB is but a small player in the world wide context. I would lik= e to know who discussed and implemented this plan since I was never co= nsulted and being a consistant user since the band was first licensed= to radio amateurs. My last count was over 30 countries worked on norm= al CW world wide. I shall be using the band in the traditional way and work DX on any fr= equency where it appears in the CW mode. g3kev .=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Gary - G4WGT=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 7:57 PM Subject: Re: LF: 137 band Mal, Will you have a look at the attached RSGB band plan for 137 kHz. You will note from that I am operating as per the official band plan= in the "Non telegraphy digital modes" section - 137.400 to 137.600 kH= z. The TA section is - 137.700 to 137.800 kHz. Only you have complained, as usual, OK. Gary - G4WGT. On 20 June 2010 18:35, mal hamilton wrote: Gary can u pse use the freq area around 135.7 - 136.4 kcs for data= modes. The sub band 137- 137.8 is used by QRS stns UK, EU and Russia= for qso acty. The sub band 135.5 - 137 for CW acty, which leaves 135.7 - 136.4= available for data modes and avoids qrm from others. 73 de mal/g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01CB10E0.5F112930 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Roger
I am only quoting how the band has be= en used since=20 the beginning ie this is how it evolved. The band has been 100% CW and= QRSCW=20 until recently.
This band was not intended for spread= spectrum=20 modes to suit appliance operators. I do not recall any discussion abou= t a RSGB=20 band plan and the RSGB is but a small player in the world wide context= . I would=20 like to know who discussed and implemented this plan since I was never= consulted=20 and being a consistant user since the band was first licensed to= radio=20 amateurs. My last count was over 30 countries worked on norm= al=20 CW world wide.
I shall be using the band in the trad= itional way=20 and work DX on any frequency where it appears in the CW mode.
g3kev
.
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010= 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 137 band

Mal,

Will you have a look at the attached RSGB band plan for 137 kHz= .

You will note from that I am operating as per the official band= plan in=20 the "Non telegraphy digital modes" section - 137.400 to 137.600 kHz.=

The TA section is - 137.700 to 137.800 kHz.

Only you have complained, as usual, OK.

Gary - G4WGT.

On 20 June 2010 18:35, mal hamilton <g3kevm= al@talktalk.net>=20 wrote:
Gary can u pse use the freq area= around 135.7 -=20 136.4 kcs for data modes. The sub band 137- 137.8 is used by QRS= stns UK, EU=20 and Russia for qso acty.
The sub band 135.5 - 137 for CW&n= bsp;acty,=20 which leaves 135.7 - 136.4 available for data modes and avoids qrm= from=20 others.
73 de mal/g3kev
 

<= /BODY> ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01CB10E0.5F112930--