Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> Received: from rly-db02.mx.aol.com (rly-db02.mail.aol.com [172.19.130.77]) by air-db02.mail.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB022-ab1475152ff36d; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 07:26:52 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-db02.mx.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDB027-ab1475152ff36d; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 07:26:40 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1IyRPu-0000wM-Ch for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:25:54 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1IyRPt-0000wD-QN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:25:53 +0000 Received: from mk-filter-2-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.100.53] helo=mk-filter-2-a-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk>) id 1IyRPq-0007Ha-7Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:25:53 +0000 X-Trace: 642437802-mk-filter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com-B2C-$THROTTLED-DYNAMIC-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 88.106.127.97 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAOLhUEdYan9h/2dsb2JhbAA Received: from 88-106-127-97.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO wgt01) ([88.106.127.97]) by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with SMTP; 01 Dec 2007 12:25:40 +0000 Message-ID: <001f01c83415$49004090$617f6a58@wgt01> From: "Gary - G4WGT" <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> References: <00c101c832cc$1e7747f0$e1136a58@wgt01> <1E301CE5F3F64CE3AB3BC05EEC77E36F@Amilo3205> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 12:25:39 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 071130-0, 30/11/2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Karma: 0: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: Re: Re: Loran Anthorn Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : + Hi Markus, Thanks for that explanation, that must be the reason why I was seeing additional lines. All is normal from yesterday (30th). Cheers, Gary - G4WGT. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Markus Vester" <markusvester@aol.com> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 11:03 AM Subject: LF: Re: Loran Anthorn Hi Gary, LF, according to my 100 kHz monitor, Anthorn Loran came on the Lessay chain rate (GRI 6731) yesterday 10:25 UT. After some adjustments of the transmission delay, they reached their "final parking position" in the old Rugby slot (27.3 ms after Lessay) at about 11:40. The sideband lines should now be on the usual frequencies, i.e. exact multiples of 100 kHz / 6731 / 2. The time-domain graph was recorded 2007-11-30, 10:00 (bottom) to 13:00 (top), using 22050 samples/s (left to right) and phase encoded as colour. Best wishes to all Markus, DF6NM ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary - G4WGT" <g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk> To: "LF (Rsgb LF Group)" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 10:09 PM Subject: LF: Loran Anthorn > Hi All, > > Can anyone tell me how to calculate the extra lines produced by Loran > Anthorn on 137 KHz. I now have twice as many lines as before which are not > shown on my spreadsheet list of line frequencies previously seen. > > My location is considerably closer to Anthorn than Rugby although I would > have thought that if the pulse generation is the same I will still see the > same lines but stronger. > > Any comments please. > > 73 > > Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp > > >