Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:18:09 +0100
Received: from ptb-spamcore01.plus.net ([192.168.71.1])
	  by pih-mxcore07.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DRWJl-0004w4-7A 
	  for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:18:09 +0100
Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD)
	id 1DRWO6-000PPR-Cp
	for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:22:38 +0100
Received: from [192.168.101.75] (helo=pih-mxcore09.plus.net)
	by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD)
	id 1DRWO6-000PPO-AG
	for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:22:38 +0100
Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20])
	  by pih-mxcore09.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DRWJk-0006bn-DF 
	  for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:18:08 +0100
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1DRWJN-0003SS-Aa
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:17:45 +0100
Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1DRWJM-0003SJ-VA
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:17:44 +0100
Received: from smtpout01-04.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.165.79])
	by relay.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DRWJL-00012d-Cz
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:17:44 +0100
Received: (qmail 28065 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2005 14:17:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (208.37.242.34)
  by smtpout01-04.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.79) with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2005 14:17:41 -0000
Message-ID: <001f01c54cc7$d3bd5250$8d01a8c0@JKA>
From: "John Andrews" <w1tag@w1tag.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <E1DRVKP-0002zT-Sz@post.thorcom.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:29:17 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 64.202.165.79 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of w1tag.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none
Subject: LF: Re: RE: Re: TA APR 28/29
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00)

Dave,

Your setup sounds fine, and the 0.020 Hz reading is close enough for any
practical purpose. And you won't draw me into an argument about QSO's over
multiple days!

I should really have copied your signal in the following segment. The
numbers all looked good, but no results. Back in the "good old days", I
would have a .wav file, and would manipulate a bunch of parameters to coax
out some copy. Not a very valuable technique for QSO's! I think we are
better off just taking what comes out of the program as it's being run.

The "f: 0.020" entries were frequent enough to convince me that it was
seeing the signal regularly up to 0300 or so. Little useful info appeared
after that.

John Andrews