Return-Path: Received: (qmail 64505 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2005 13:59:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 26 Feb 2005 13:59:09 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D52Uf-0005RO-K3 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:00:30 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D52Uf-0005R8-0F for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:00:29 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1D52TL-000JYe-6X for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:59:07 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1D52TA-0007uk-Bq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:58:56 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1D52T9-0007uX-SD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:58:55 +0000 Received: from hugo.fen-net.de ([212.204.115.10] ident=root) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D52T7-0006Ov-8X for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:58:55 +0000 Received: from PCVONWALTER (dialin-nbg-118.fen-net.de [212.204.116.118]) by hugo.fen-net.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j1QDwaGe006201 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:58:37 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <001f01c51c0c$b10afdc0$fe79a8c0@PCVONWALTER> From: "Walter Staubach" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:08:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.83, clamav-milter version 0.83 on helene.f3n.de X-Virus-Status: Clean X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by hugo.fen-net.de id j1QDwaGe006201 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 212.204.115.10 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of fen-net.de X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: Re: Re: 807s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Thanks, Peter, for more infomation. We talk about the same 807, hi. 73 Walter -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: g3ldo An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Datum: Samstag, 26. Februar 2005 00:35 Betreff: LF: Re: 807s >From: "Walter Staubach" > is "your" 807 the same tube as I remember: PA-tube, 6V heater, anode >loss 25W, anode voltage 400 to 700V, penthode. >It was used for homebrew transmitters, often with the GELOSO-VFO ( CW and AM >only ). One connection ontop of the glass, I think that was anode. A rather >big tube. If it is the same - why building a receiver with it? :-) > >The 807 was the most popular PA tube for HB in the 50s and 60s. They were >plentiful and reasonably cheap and could handle a lot of misuse. They were >tetrodes with an anode (plate) topcap.With a maximum PA voltage of around >750v and a current of 100mA they could put out around 40 or 50w. >I used a couple of 1625s (12.6v heater equivalent of the 807) in a zero bias >pushpull high level modulator. >The Geloso VFO was my first ever commercial ham radio purchase. I modified >it by replacing the 6V6 driver with a QVO-47. >I think the reason these high power tubes were used in receiver distribution >amplifiers is that they operated in the linear portion of the curve no >matter what large signal strength signals appeared in the passband. > >Nostalgia aint what it used to be! > >Peter G3LDO > >