Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25172 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2003 16:12:13 -0000 Received: from netmail02.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.221) by mailstore with SMTP; 15 Mar 2003 16:12:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 28816 invoked by uid 10001); 15 Mar 2003 16:12:13 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail02.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 15 Mar 2003 16:12:13 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18uEFl-0003TX-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:11:21 +0000 Received: from [212.1.130.142] (helo=smtp-1.visp.telinco.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18uEFg-0003TO-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:11:16 +0000 Received: from [80.225.213.160] (helo=RSGB613192) by smtp-1.visp.telinco.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 18uEFf-0004lg-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:11:15 +0000 Message-ID: <001f01c2eb0d$9bd93200$045bfea9@RSGB613192> From: "Andy talbot" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <01C2E966.68104D30.g4jnt@thersgb.net> <003201c2ea71$3706ed00$20c5e150@hughspc> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:11:57 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: Re: Re: RE: The leT/A of the law Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0tests=REFERENCESversion=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Err.... Hugh, I don't HAVE a web site, and don't intend creating one in the near future. What have you read, where ? Probably probably scurrilous fibs and fantasy Should I be concerned ;-< There is too much of that on the web More seriously though, the specific bands listed in BR68 section 2.4 refer to UNATTENDED beacons - ie where you are not in the house at all and they cannot be turned off immediately on request. Attended beacons are not covered by any specific mention, but note section 1.2 where it calls up 'self training'. I would think any beacon transmissions for a scientific purpose such as LF propagation research would be more than covered by this clause, and using this sort of mode on LF is certainly more of a self training issue than some of the stuff I hear on HF/VHF these days. Andy G4JNT > I know, I've read all about it on your web site. > But, thanks for taking the trouble to answer my posting, much appreciated. > > 73 > Hugh M0WYE > > >