Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>
Received: (qmail 22888 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2002 00:21:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO warrior.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.227)  by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2002 00:21:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 22558 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2002 00:21:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70)  by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2002 00:21:45 -0000
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16O6QU-0000bz-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2002 00:17:06 +0000
Received: from fep04.swip.net ([130.244.199.132] helo=fep04-svc.swip.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 16O6QT-0000bt-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2002 00:17:05 +0000
Received: from oemcomputer ([212.151.12.83]) by fep04-svc.swip.net          with SMTP          id <20020109001617.KCKA21005.fep04-svc.swip.net@oemcomputer>          for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>;          Wed, 9 Jan 2002 01:16:17 +0100
Message-ID: <001f01c198a2$e9a96040$530c97d4@oemcomputer>
From: "Johan Bodin" <sm6lkm.jbeab@swipnet.se>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020107152540.00aceaf0@gemini.herts.ac.uk> <001801c19822$783c1cc0$eb16073e@dave> <00f201c19890$38d6d340$d19a17d2@steve>
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Band Plan
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 01:16:36 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Hi-ho

I am convinced that "Gentlemen's agreement" will work much
better than a band plan (provided that all involved are gentlemen...)
New modes evolves almost every day. Let them prosper!

The 2100Hz "wide" LF band does not need a band plan carved
in stone! There is only a handful of operators on the LF band.
Compare that to the >10e6 operators that are active on HF...

Most, if not ALL, of the LF operators are connected to this mail
reflector - it should be fairly easy to coordinate things - if the need
should ever arise...

Remember that occasional interferers on the band is only a
phonecall/e-mail away and you can easily stop them when you
have a very important message to convey via LF... :-)
Interfering signals escape with the speed of light... (3e8m/s)
Why bother about a band plan when it can be solved on a
day-to-day basis?

This mail reflector, on the other hand, seems to need some kind
of a "band plan"... The S/N ratio is getting worse...

What is most fun? Exploring radio or making rules (or perhaps
throwing flames on an email reflector)?

Hihi... <g> :-) etc..

 73 de Johan SM6LKM

(yes, I do love hand sent CW too)