Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16920 invoked from network); 26 Jun 1999 23:23:47 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 26 Jun 1999 23:23:47 +0100 Received: (qmail 15902 invoked from network); 26 Jun 1999 22:23:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 26 Jun 1999 22:23:54 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 10y0a1-0006LB-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 23:05:45 +0100 Received: from neodymium.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.83]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 10y0a0-0006L6-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 23:05:44 +0100 Received: from [212.140.33.70] (helo=default) by neodymium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 10y0Wm-0000ko-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 26 Jun 1999 23:02:24 +0100 Message-ID: <001e01bec01f$ebc79f80$46218cd4@default> From: "Alan Melia" To: "rsgb_lf_group" Subject: LF: Field strength measurement....Rik Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 22:53:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: Hi Rik, I have been grappling with the idea that I need to know how good (or how bad!) my antenna is on reception. After several months of listening and slight changes I know it isn't good enough...but how do I know if I have built a better one or improved it? My searchings brought me up to a page in Terman (mine's a 1948 copy!) in Ch13 pg 974 (but I think it will vary with the editions) which advises on how to inject a known field strength into a loop with a signal generator. It uses a coil across the sig gen output with a reactance at least three times the output impedance of the generator, and placed about twice the largest dimension of the loop aerial, away from the loop. There is an equation for the field strength generated. It occurs to me that a coil of 150ohms reactance at 136kHz is about 300uH which is quite a sizeable solenoid. I guess that an emitter follower to reduce the output impedance to about 1 ohm, would bring the requirement down to about 3uH which is a lot easier to wind, and a lot more compact. Then your 1-turn loop aerial would be a possible way of doing it?? The field strength is given by e= (18.85*N*E*(r)^2)/X*d^3 where N is the number of turns on the exciter coil E is the sig-gen voltage in mV r is radius of the exciter coil; in cm d is the distance between the exciter coil and loop aerial in metres X is the reactance of the exciter coil and e is in uV/metre There is not a lot more than that in the text but I am willing to send a photocopy to anyone who wants it. I believe that there is a similar explanation in a 1956 copy of The Radio Laboratory Handbook by the well known Mr Scroggie. I can't check the above formula against that because I loaned my copy to someone a few years ago and didn't get it back. Hope that's useful....there is a lot of interesting gen about loop aerials in the latest Radcomm, probably similar to a lot that has been published before, but an interesting practical design incorporating a 'rejector' tuned circuit that might help Wolf with his strong out of band QRM. 73 de Alan G3NYK Alan.Melia@btinternet.com